I'm gonna get my hands on this. It will hopefully be cheap. Does anyone know if results are improved with derma-rolling?
just do a quick google search around, a few people have tried the 0.03% thing for a few months with fairly decent results.
The problems were: It was incredibly expensive to use even for a few months, about $25-30 a week, so you're talking 1200-1400 a year or so.
Which essentially means it's not worth it at the 0.03% solution.
try it out for a few months though, but dont be shocked if that doesnt work, it doesnt mean bim wont, just that the 0.03% is very light.
02-23-2015 07:37 PM
Hairismylife
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawg
just do a quick google search around, a few people have tried the 0.03% thing for a few months with fairly decent results.
The problems were: It was incredibly expensive to use even for a few months, about $25-30 a week, so you're talking 1200-1400 a year or so.
Which essentially means it's not worth it at the 0.03% solution.
try it out for a few months though, but dont be shocked if that doesnt work, it doesnt mean bim wont, just that the 0.03% is very light.
What means "work", as a growth stimulant I define "work" means regrowth not merely maintenance.
02-23-2015 08:07 PM
Swooping
Do we know what % they used in the last trial? They went really high supposedly right?
02-23-2015 08:53 PM
rdawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairismylife
What means "work", as a growth stimulant I define "work" means regrowth not merely maintenance.
yes by work i mean regrowth or at least thickening, that's what a few experienced on the 0.03% solution(albeit very minor growth).
02-24-2015 02:49 AM
Seuxin
I don't understand....
Bim at 0.03% was not already approved by FDA ???
