Cots does not have a potent FDA approved Wnt promoter and has focused on drugs that are already FDA approved. Perhaps you should realize that some of us broscience PhD's have been following Cots' work for the better part of a decade before putting us down.
11-22-2014 02:22 PM
It's2014ComeOnAlready
Quote:
Originally Posted by KO1
Cots does not have a potent FDA approved Wnt promoter and has focused on drugs that are already FDA approved. Perhaps you should realize that some of us broscience PhD's have been following Cots' work for the better part of a decade before putting us down.
I wasn't trying to put anyone down, just saying that I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
11-22-2014 02:28 PM
KO1
Quote:
Originally Posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
I wasn't trying to put anyone down, just saying that I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.
Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.
11-22-2014 03:13 PM
It's2014ComeOnAlready
Quote:
Originally Posted by KO1
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.
Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.
Haha, you people are crazy. Maybe I won't post, so I don't have to deal with the vitriolic and insane responses when I've said nothing worthy of intense criticism. Plus, you miss the point of follica being cagey all along - so then, why would they let the world know (as well as other teams working on this issue) what they're working with? How do you know no money went to Follica? You don't, so shut it.
11-22-2014 03:20 PM
KO1
Because I looked at their SEC filings.
11-22-2014 03:33 PM
It's2014ComeOnAlready
Quote:
Originally Posted by KO1
Because I looked at their SEC filings.
Again, that's great but you weren't aware of their financial info before the $55 million investment. You really don't actually know much about what they've been up to or where they're at, and neither does anybody else on here. I'm just being positive, and yes, I should continue to post because I have informed and positive things to say.
Congratulations on your phD in broscience and superior knowledge(?) about future hair loss treatments, even though not very much info has been released on follica's progress.
11-22-2014 08:27 PM
DeuceWillis
Guys, guys, guys... Calm down, don't argue with each other we're all balding here lmao. Technically no matter how much we patrol the Internet, research companies, keep up with trials, etc. etc... We are on a public forum, on the blind side of all advances, and are completely at their mercy when it comes to the publicity of their information. Anything on here is usually speculation and opinion. No better than people posting pics of their assh*les. Let's just be patient and see what they reveal.
11-22-2014 08:47 PM
hellouser
Quote:
Originally Posted by KO1
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, are unfamiliar with Cots' work, and should seriously consider not posting on these forums.
Finally, as of now Follica has not seen a single cent from Puretech Ventures' 55M raise.
Uh... how do you know that?
11-24-2014 12:01 PM
Shinobi
do we know the molecular structure of sm04554 ?
11-25-2014 06:51 PM
Swooping
Did anyone sign up for this trial? Would be awesome to get updated through the trial.