Replicel

Printable View

  • 02-07-2012 05:40 PM
    Seb89
    Yeah ten years is quite dis heartening. I thought from now, it would be five at most.

    Sigh.
  • 02-07-2012 05:52 PM
    2020
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Seb89 View Post
    Yeah ten years is quite dis heartening. I thought from now, it would be five at most.

    Sigh.

    who said 10 years? Even Histogen is not that far away
  • 02-07-2012 06:40 PM
    DepressedByHairLoss
    Yeah, absolutely none of the companies ever said their treatments were 10 years away. At the most, some said their treatments were 5 years away and those treatments could even arrive earlier in some Asian countries. We should listen to what the actual companies say, and not that little young Andy Dick reporter.
  • 02-07-2012 11:59 PM
    sausage
    Who knows, a lot of companys have said 5 years, 10 years, 2 years etc in the past and nothing happend.

    Its just the article said a baldness cure could be with us within the next 10 years. Thats how it got onto this conversation.

    So hopefully at least within 10 years something will be available. But hopefully something will be hear a lot sooner.
  • 02-08-2012 12:54 AM
    Maradona
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sausage View Post
    Who knows, a lot of companys have said 5 years, 10 years, 2 years etc in the past and nothing happend.

    Its just the article said a baldness cure could be with us within the next 10 years. Thats how it got onto this conversation.

    So hopefully at least within 10 years something will be available. But hopefully something will be hear a lot sooner.

    If replicel doesn't work...i'll just shave my head and move on. I can't wait 10 years...i don't think i'll care about hair loss in 10 years anymore...we need hair ASAP :mad: .

    If you're young the baldness can be very painful but rewarding at the same time (maybe) since a cure is coming for SURE within 10 years.

    Us oldiest ain't got much time left.
  • 02-08-2012 05:28 AM
    Sogeking
    Actually Washenik said 5 years, although Washenik has been saying that since 2005 or 2006 :D :D.
    But I really don't think it will take them 10 years. Ever since I have joined this forum the timeline for me was always 2015/2016. And honestly I still believe in that timeline....
    However regardles when these treatments come I am gonna wait for a year to see the response from the first treated customers/patients...
  • 02-08-2012 07:00 AM
    Mojo Risin
    They always say 5 years for everythin when in reality, it could be 10 years, 20, 50, 100 or even NEVER.

    Nobody knows.
  • 02-08-2012 07:18 AM
    Tracy C
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Sogeking View Post
    However regardles when these treatments come I am gonna wait for a year to see the response from the first treated customers/patients...

    Not me. Once my doctor offers it, I will go in for it ASAP.
  • 02-08-2012 08:16 AM
    StressedToTheBald
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mojo Risin View Post
    They always say 5 years for everythin when in reality, it could be 10 years, 20, 50, 100 or even NEVER.

    Nobody knows.

    Its exactly the case.
  • 02-08-2012 02:17 PM
    southasian
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Maradona View Post
    If replicel doesn't work...i'll just shave my head and move on. I can't wait 10 years...i don't think i'll care about hair loss in 10 years anymore...we need hair ASAP :mad: .

    If you're young the baldness can be very painful but rewarding at the same time (maybe) since a cure is coming for SURE within 10 years.

    Us oldiest ain't got much time left.

    Every year, they'll be extending the FDA trials and keep telling us 5-10 years. I'll be six feet under 20 years down the road and these morons (big pharma) will keep saying "we're so close, Phase II trials are underway, only 5 more years...hang on folks!"

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth