• 05-03-2012 08:40 AM
    amadeus
    What it had to do with is the poisonous attitude you bring to this forum. I just pointed out that you and some of your friends are basically ruining Dr. Gho’s good reputation. He apparently has an uphill battle as it is, but you people are literally destroying any creditability that he has built. I actaully feel bad for him and for everyone who really wants to see HST become more well known.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedHairASAP View Post
    this is a replicel thread. So not sure why you're talking about Gho

    my questions that you quoted had nothing to do with Gho

  • 05-03-2012 09:58 AM
    jman91
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Delphi View Post
    I can’t stand the negativity and mean spirits that some people on this forum have. It’s like they have no soul and want these treatments to fail.

    but come on the results were really bad, they tried to put some positive wording to spin it like a minor success but 12% is utterly useless let alone possibly bad enough going to end replicels funding. I am disappointed, but i'm not in denial. just wanted something so bad that you want see the facts is stupid.
  • 05-03-2012 10:00 AM
    jman91
    but come on the results were really bad, they tried to put some positive wording to spin it like a minor success but 12% is utterly useless let alone possibly bad enough going to end replicels funding.

    * I am disappointed, but i'm not in denial. just wanting something so bad that you cant see the facts is stupid.*
  • 05-03-2012 10:10 AM
    Tracy C
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    ...but 12% is utterly useless let alone possibly bad enough going to end replicels funding.

    It's only a six month interim result! Pull your heads out people! Call a proctologist if you need to.

    It would be a tragedy if Replicel lost funding because so many people are too foolish to see what they have achieved. If that happens, I blame all of you who are too dead from the neck up to be able to see what was achieved. You are ruining it for everyone.
  • 05-03-2012 10:16 AM
    jman91
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    It's only a six month interim result! Pull your heads out people! Call a proctologist if you need to.

    It would be a tragedy if Replicel lost funding because so many people are too foolish to see what they have achieved. If that happens, I blame all of you who are too dead from the neck up to be able to see what was achieved. You are ruining it for everyone.

    we don't need any more companies that just get your hopes up but never deliver
  • 05-03-2012 10:22 AM
    Tracy C
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    we don't need any more companies that just get your hopes up but never deliver

    Obviously, you don't get it. Go spread your negative poison somewhere else.
  • 05-03-2012 10:28 AM
    UK_
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    but come on the results were really bad, they tried to put some positive wording to spin it like a minor success but 12% is utterly useless let alone possibly bad enough going to end replicels funding. I am disappointed, but i'm not in denial. just wanted something so bad that you want see the facts is stupid.

    12%? More like 3%

    A total failure, I remember Intercytex achieving similar results in their first clinical trial, no doubt mid-Phase 2 Replicel will pull some bullshit about funding & drop out of the trials declaring the entire endeavour a failure.

    So that's DP, DSC cells all down the drain - looks like we're running out of options here. But if the body can create it, why cant man?
  • 05-03-2012 10:31 AM
    UK_
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    It's only a six month interim result! Pull your heads out people! Call a proctologist if you need to.

    It would be a tragedy if Replicel lost funding because so many people are too foolish to see what they have achieved. If that happens, I blame all of you who are too dead from the neck up to be able to see what was achieved. You are ruining it for everyone.

    I dont expect anything miraculous to happen in the coming 12 months - what - are the cells they injected just sitting in the scalp waiting to grow hair? I feel a bigger issue may be dosage - but 3% is an utter joke - so for 100 hairs per cm2 you'd need how many treatments? lol.
  • 05-03-2012 10:33 AM
    BoSox
    I'm with you Tracy. Regardless of %, let's hear what the CEO has to say.

    If they are claiming positive results, let's let them explain themselves.

    Keeping the faith.
  • 05-03-2012 10:35 AM
    gmonasco
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by UK_ View Post
    what - are the cells they injected just sitting in the scalp waiting to grow hair?

    Since a normal catagen/telogen phase in established hair follicles typically lasts between 3-4 months, you might not see much (or any) growth from new/revived follicles within 6 months.

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

"Trans-friendly hair transplant surgeons recommended?"
02-09-2024 08:47 PM
Last Post By SonopaalFounik
Yesterday 10:32 PM
New hair care regime based on gene / anti-ageing science
02-22-2022 10:45 AM
Last Post By MolinaKim2091
Yesterday 07:28 AM
How can I promote my own business?
08-31-2022 01:29 PM
Last Post By samibaceri
Yesterday 01:30 AM
Dr Woods doinf European tour?
09-15-2012 03:44 AM
by didi
Last Post By kathysmith
Yesterday 01:29 AM
teeth bleaching near me
11-21-2023 07:05 AM
Last Post By KenyaFuentes
04-25-2024 01:34 PM