Far as I recall data should have been posted around the end of September? That's what Andy said to me ages ago.
10-08-2011 01:25 AM
doke
The divine skin nanoxidil 5% supposed to be above minoxidil for results? i wonder if it is as always a bit sceptical,i did contact ds and they said to use with the f7 so that would be a bit expensive.
We all would not mind if it helped but as always until we try it nothing is proved.:eek:
10-08-2011 02:36 AM
Zoidberg
Results are up: http://www .trx2.com/store/clinical-study-results/
10-08-2011 04:38 AM
AgainstThis
Suspiciously lacking any and all pictures and basically telling me that by now I should have seen a 35% increase in my hair and that if I keep at it for another 9 months, it will be a whopping 50% increase.
I just don't see it. Really. Maybe it'll happen but I just can't be that optimistic.
PS My Toppik arrives on Monday. Will let you know how viable it may be till I get the full 50% back. Mwaha :)
10-08-2011 06:12 AM
PaulC
Quote:
Originally Posted by doke
The divine skin nanoxidil 5% supposed to be above minoxidil for results? i wonder if it is as always a bit sceptical,i did contact ds and they said to use with the f7 so that would be a bit expensive.
We all would not mind if it helped but as always until we try it nothing is proved.:eek:
I’m planning to try F7 first, then if that’s not giving results try DNC-N and finally combine them if need be but that would be expensive.
10-08-2011 06:14 AM
Ted
Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).
One thing that strikes me though is this:
Duration of hair loss (months)
TRX2™
5.3 ± 3.1
Placebo
4.7 ± 2.3
Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?
10-08-2011 06:26 AM
Jcm800
I must be on the vegetable capsules-bullshit baffles brains and off they go again. Who were these trial people? Where's pictorial evidence? Oh and let's all fund them for twelve months now? They keep dangling that carrot..
10-08-2011 06:45 AM
gutted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted
Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).
One thing that strikes me though is this:
Duration of hair loss (months)
TRX2™
5.3 ± 3.1
Placebo
4.7 ± 2.3
Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?
I think the idea is that the people in the early stages of hair loss will (re)gain significant regrowth, hence why they were picked.
10-08-2011 06:47 AM
AgainstThis
What Ted notes is the most interesting. If all test subjects had JUST begun losing their hair (And how is that measured exactly? A NW1 breaking to 2? Not even THAT maybe? So actually people with zero visible loss?) how are any gains measured?
And yes, whilst it would make sense that if this alters your metabolism and BLAH BLAH it would take that much time to accomplish I seriously doubt it. No pictures is the biggest problem here.
Still. Between Replicel and Toppik, I get a tiny bit optimistic here people :)
10-08-2011 09:43 AM
Jcm800
Yep, I'm the negative poster here but I'm not convinced by these results in the slightest. I'm quitting at eight months but will however continue taking individual compounds for the hell of it and because it's cheaper.
Interesting to see how long termers get on with it tho-good luck, keen for you guys to report temporal hair re-growth!
