and I said this: It's much easier to be negative with these things....
If Replicel fails: haha I was right all along!
If Replicel succeeds: haha screw this forum and my reputation, I'm getting me some hair.
You win in both cases! :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
04-14-2012 09:36 AM
sausage
I just find it astonishing that they have not set a specific date for the results.
Does it really take that much intelligence to count a few hairs in a small area of the head?
Maybe they have grown a whole bush of hair which they are finding impossible to count and thats why they are not sure when they will work it out. :)
04-14-2012 09:40 AM
Kamui85
...
can someone point to me what phases I, II, and III mean respectively?
04-14-2012 09:50 AM
lpenergy
We have to remember that our collective judgements are being clouded by prior failures (or delayed successes) which don't necessarily have any bearing on Replicel.
There is nothing wrong with a legit +50% increase. This study may not indicate if their technology has the ability to dramatically slow down hairloss. That is valuable in and of itself.
Optomistic, fingers crossed!
04-14-2012 09:50 AM
sausage
I assume this treatment would only be used on exposed scalp areas and assume that people who want treatment would have to go back again for more once they have lost a lot of hair.
Surely this would not be injected in an area that is thinning but is still thick..... as the new hair that grows will be getting in the way of the existing hair.
04-14-2012 09:59 AM
gmonasco
Quote:
Originally Posted by sausage
I just find it astonishing that they have not set a specific date for the results. Does it really take that much intelligence to count a few hairs in a small area of the head?
It does take some minimal intelligence to understand that the analysis of the clinical trial results involves much more than simply counting hairs.
04-14-2012 10:04 AM
2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmonasco
It does take some minimal intelligence to understand that the analysis of the clinical trial results involves much more than simply counting hairs.
seriously! Even though Replicel operates in Georgia or something, they still have to follow FDA's protocols.... do you know how much paperwork alone there is???
04-14-2012 10:10 AM
534623
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2020
seriously! Even though Replicel operates in Georgia or something, they still have to follow FDA's protocols.... do you know how much paperwork alone there is???
fda= us food and drug administration, agency of the united states federal government that approves or rejects new drugs and medical devices.
who is the "fda" in georgia (union of soviet socialist republics) ?
04-14-2012 10:17 AM
2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by 534623
fda= us food and drug administration, agency of the united states federal government that approves or rejects new drugs and medical devices.
who is the "fda" in georgia (union of soviet socialist republics) ?
doesn't matter. Replicel said that they will follow FDA's protocols even though they don't operate anywhere near US.... dealing with the FDA means a lot of paperwork. That's why it takes so long to just analyze the results
