...using beard and scalp hair , this was a norwood 6 fully restored !
No it wasn't. Beard hair and body hair have different characteristics than scalp hair. This was just a cover that has the "look" of full restoration - but it isn't truly a "full restoration". Personally, I feel beard and body hair should be left for extreme repair and truma cases only. Not as a general practice.
02-21-2012 04:58 PM
ejj
Isnt that the goal , to achieve the look of full restoration , sorry if you took what I said out of context , we were discussing transplants I may of wrongly assumed that everyone understood my comments ,therefore I will re phrase it .." beard and scalp grafts via fue , have achieved the ..` illusion ` of full restoration "
I have had 1000 beard grafts, grafted into my scars very little difference re characteristics, so much so im booked in for more repair work in May , I think beard hair will become more of a valuable donor source as the traditional scalp donor runs out , more and more Drs are trying to use it with various results , i guess some are just better at it than others
regards
ejj
02-21-2012 06:00 PM
25 going on 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Follicle Death Row
3,500 in the hairline is of course ridiculous. However I can see a good argument for those with donor reserves of 10,000 by strip and FUE to go for up to 3,500 in the first 65cm2 or roughly frontal third. Assuming that number is available for maximum donor a norwood 6 can have the following:
3,500 in the first 65cm2 - about 54FU/cm2
3,000 in the next 65cm2 - about 46 FU/cm2
3,500 in the crown, 110cm2 - about 32 FU/cm2
I have heard of people with 11,000 available by all methods so they can reach just over 40 FU/cm2 even in the crown. Good results are still possible but if you don't have 9,000 available and are headed for norwood 6 you may not be satisfied.
Still there are some great successes. I really like this one. I believe the patient has used up 7,300ish of a donor rated at over 10,000. Plus as far as I'm aware he never availed of meds. I think the outcome is great.
That's a lot of grafts. I wonder how common it is to have such a generous donor region.
02-22-2012 10:43 AM
Follicle Death Row
Quote:
Originally Posted by 25 going on 65
That's a lot of grafts. I wonder how common it is to have such a generous donor region.
I don't have a clue.
02-22-2012 05:25 PM
Locke
I do not like this thread.
A hair transplant will never provide 100% density. That is a fact and if it has not been made clear to you by your hair transplant surgeon, then you should not be having surgery with them.
Alvi Armani is a scam and I don't believe they practice in Canada anymore. They commit too many hairs to the frontal hairline.
Dr. Rahal's strategy (my surgeon) is to have increased density in the frontal hairline (60%ish) then decrease this density as you move back towards the crown. He also makes it clear that you will most likely have a bald spot at the crown at the end of all the surgeries because there just isn't enough hair.
I am completely fine with all of this. I had my HT done June 21st and I'm completely satisfied with the results (3,128 hairs in the frontal 1/3rd). I tried shaving my head and it looked horrible. Although my hair now doesn't look 100% like it used to, it is much better than it would look completely bald.
For all of you holding back on having a hair transplant done because you fear the results won't look realistic, sometimes you just need to have the courage and take the leap. The results may not be completely realistic but they're far better than doing nothing and moping about it for years.
02-22-2012 10:13 PM
Still-Researching
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I
For all of you holding back on having a hair transplant done because you fear the results won't look realistic, sometimes you just need to have the courage and take the leap. The results may not be completely realistic but they're far better than doing nothing and moping about it for years.
I like this comment, however sure it does not work for everyone. You seem to have had realistic expectations and I am working on mine. I am 1 months into a 2500 FUE - and looking forward to see the outcome in 12 months.
Happy to hear you are happy - Rahal is on most people's top lists or should be.
02-23-2012 06:10 AM
chrisis
Still Researching, curious where you're from? Got any latest photos? I'm in Newcastle, UK and trying to decide on a transplant doc. Cheers :)
02-23-2012 08:47 AM
Still-Researching
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisis
Still Researching, curious where you're from? Got any latest photos? I'm in Newcastle, UK and trying to decide on a transplant doc. Cheers :)
and good luck with your recovery! Maybe in a year's time I'll be where you are now ;)
02-23-2012 10:11 AM
25 going on 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisis
Still Researching, curious where you're from? Got any latest photos? I'm in Newcastle, UK and trying to decide on a transplant doc. Cheers :)
This is kind of off-topic, but over the years I've read quite a few claims online that the UK is a bad place for hair restoration surgery, and that British citizens should travel off the island for their procedures...
Do you know if that holds any merit? I don't understand why this would be the case in such a modern country. :confused:
Even if it's generally true, it seems like there should be at least a handful of reputable UK surgeons?
