FUE Vs DHI, which results are more natural?

Generally, is there one that ends up looking more natural than the other?
Especially when it comes to the frontline?
And regarding the angle/ direction of the implanted hair, one can often read that DHI gives doctors more precision to implant at the right angle, therefore giving it a more natural look. True?

I couldn't find an answer to this in the forum, so sorry if it had been answered somewhere already.

The final outcome of hair transplant depends on several factors like: Surgeon's experience and technique, quality and quantity of the donor hair, patient's individual healing and growth patterns, etc...

Regarding the hairline, both techniques can produce natural-looking hairlines if the surgeon has the experience and expertise to create a natural-looking hairline design that matches the patient's existing hair pattern.

As for the angle and direction of implanted hair, it is true that DHI provides greater precision in implantation due to the use of Choi Implanter, resulting in a more natural-look.