Gho's files patent for Hair multiplication

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • caddarik79
    replied
    I am not saying HST is HM, I made the distinction more than once and am conscious it's not for next year, and hasci confirmed me the same.


    I just don't agree with you when you try to tell me Gaz result does not show something exceptionnal!!!

    it's not the cure, we both agree on that, but it's brilliant, and the best so far... there, we don't agree!!!

    it's too expensive for result per procedure, I kind of agree with you!!!

    They refused the test... be honest, they accepted and did one or two but probably realised that the public was only waiting for them to fail... and I guess even if a technique is good, you still have a marge for failure, or difficulties... and they felt, you and some others would be there to use it against them and generalize!!! (i don't say they were right to step back, I just play devil's advocate)

    some other clinics lost their trials against them.

    Gaz convinces me...

    HM is not for now... I hope it will come one day!!!

    Mwamba is very quiet, I guess he feels his association with Nigam is rubbish advertising!!!

    remember how Nigam was criticizing Gho?... look what Nigam did to his guinea pigs.

    I won't spit on hasci, I will keep on temporising and observe and welcome Gaz evolution!!!!

    if with another 1400 grafts taken, his donor still looks the same, I book a 1800 to put 900 in front and 900 in vertex!!!

    then after two three years, I repeat...

    then, I wait for HM!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by caddarik79
    Again, why would a man who's a media person, everyday in the Dutch media, makes his money partly on his looks, is a self proclaimed vain person, why would he go only once to HASCI while he's now looking like this: http://www.showbizzsite.be/nieuws/fr...eloven-1225497 ??? Typical Hasci HST look.

    Why would a proud and self proclaimed vain celebrity, with all the money in the world, settle for looking like an idiot if HST would really work and he would be able to get his density back ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by caddarik79
    why don't you show those results from HST?
    What does that have to do with regrowth? I think Sneijder went once to Hasci ? He could as well have gone to a FUE clinic, he would have even gotten more grafts.

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    depleted Sneijder :



    sweaty soccer fully professionnaly photographed playing HST patient : http://cdn3.bet.nl/wp-content/upload...-146479231.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by caddarik79
    if you are so sure and will never do anything else than debunking, why did yo even bother bringing the patent to light?
    Why not ? I would only not do it when I would be biased. I'm not.

    Your points, do not convince me either
    That's why I think you're biased, you ignore all facts.

    especially the several known doctors from the competition, LOL
    Why ? Any doctor that can do hair multiplication would make millions per year !! Everybody wanted it, everybody tried, everybody concluded: it doesnt work.

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    http://fr.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/P...1520333_w2.jpg BEFORE


    http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/...wes-437212.jpg AFTER HST

    sure, football players using their heads to put goals use concealar!!! whay don't you show those results from HST?

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    i think you look for perfection... I get it, but then, we have another ten years to wait!!!

    I'm saying, HST is the best option for the in between time... and I just need to look at Gaz to be sure of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    read this about density : First of all, it should be noted that a very good recent research study by Coalition member Dr. Sharon Keene from Tucson, AZ showed that in “normal” men without male pattern baldness, the average follicular unit hair density at the front hairline was 51 FU/cm2 with a range of 38-78. The average density in the temple apex region (behind the recession) was around 44 FU/cm2 with a range of 25-64.

    The biggest factor in predicting whether or not the 35-40 FU/cm2 density you mentioned would look “dense” is the diameter of the hair shaft. In a man with coarse hair, that could indeed look dense. In a man with fine hair, it would probably be “see-through.” The other factor besides just stating an FU number per cm2 is the number of hairs that the follicular units average out to. Obviously, at the very edge of the front hairline you would want all 1-hair grafts, but I think it’s important to switch to 2-hair grafts fairly quickly as soon as you get 2-3 grafts deep into the hairline zone.

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I do think you are biased. ALL the facts we have point into the direction that Gho is a scam:

    1) Gho refuses to participate on a 50 graft test, even he was offered 3000 euro.
    2) Study of Gaz's hair yielded a regrowth of 0-38% where it could as easily be 0 as 38, we just didnt have the data to conclude that last part
    3) Hasci by standard advises a max of 3 HST's, if HST would work, the average patient could go over 20x to HASCI
    3) None of the celebs went more than a few times to HASCI, even while they all claim to be extremely vain and there current result looks like they need thousands of graft more. Just look at Frans Bauer, he has the typical 'extremely thin cover' HST look: http://www.showbizzsite.be/nieuws/fr...eloven-1225497 It looks just ridiculous in the sun !!
    4) HASCI hasn't been able to demonstrate a single case of something that wouldnt have been possible with FUE
    5) Dr Aaron Gardner claims it's impossible do to what Gho claims to do
    6) Several known doctors say it's BS what Gho does, they've tried it and it didnt work.

    And you say "Look Gaz donor looks good so it must work". Now who is biased here ?



    it's just that when it's good, we can also say it... and they still give green light for it.

    Imagine him, being average of above average donor, having multiple procedures with the 9 months fully respected, he would even look better then now!!!

    so yes, with his starting from, he looks sort of pristine to me!!! cause, he was below average, he got procedure on same very spot from donor, he did not respect the security delay for regeneration and still he looks very good with a strong flash on his donor in a bathroom after multiple procedures.
    [/QUOTE]



    OK, just one question:

    if you are so sure and will never do anything else than debunking, why did yo even bother bringing the patent to light?

    don't waste your time, Gardner said it, why would you bother Gaz for a shaving if you are so sure?

    Knowing the number of paragraphs you wrote to discredit them, why don't you put an end? why do you even react? I would have next it for good, if I was sure as you seem to be.


    Your points, do not convince me either, especially the several known doctors from the competition, LOL

    But again, if it's crystal clear for you, why do you help them market? ignore them for once and for good!!! otherwise it looks a bit personal...

    They do a great job on Gaz... and he got more then 3 procedures (hum) and he was below average donor!!! but you know what, I say amen to you!

    let's all wait for some good topical or cloning... + beanies and snap-back caps are back into fashion, so no worries... grow a beard!!! LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Here, this is 1 month after Gaz 4th HST. HASCI claims regrowth mostly happens in that first month, so this should be accurate. I picked an average piece of skin, and marked about 125 hairs, could be a few more or less but it's close:


    SO the question is: is that spot bigger or smaller than 1 cm2 ? Cause only if you think that spot is SMALLER than a square cm, his donor is still ok, as you claim it is. IF you think that spot is about a cm2 or maybe even bigger, than his donor IS depleted ! And I'm not even talking about the scars !! In my opinion, IF he even goes back, he should focus on filling that up, but again, I doubt he can do that without damaging other areas (without going below that 125 hairs/cm2).

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    don't get me wrong, I like constructive critics and I really liked how active you were and still are...

    I remember I followed Nigam and I was 100% with all your interventions... and look today, you were so right!!!

    HST is not the cure, they messed it up a bit with their communication... but man, I got 1800 grafts, it improved my frame and HL, my donor looks pristine, another two procedures of 1500 grafts would fix me for the next 5 or more years... I have one life, not more... what if HM is only available in ten years?

    and if it ever comes, donor will not be an issue even after multiple HST (and you will not need scar repair).

    Gaz is a very good case, really... I earn nothing admitting it... but he makes me think of booking some session!!! Just that I invested a big part of my money in real estate...

    I think we are the bridge generation/// we might taste HM, but not for our yyouth being preserved... just as a final cherry on the cake to densify what we will have accumulated with HST!!!!

    other option is acceptance until something really dramatic comes... but it's sort of gambling!!!

    I am just thinking out loud here sometimes, I did not make any decision yet!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by caddarik79
    what I am claiming is that he was already below average before even touching his donor... then, he did procedures on the very same area + not respecting the 9 months, twice in a row... and still he looks really really good, and I am not biased.
    I do think you are biased. ALL the facts we have point into the direction that Gho is a scam:

    1) Gho refuses to do a 50 graft test, even after he was offered 3000 euro.
    2) Study of Gaz's hair yielded a regrowth of 0-38% where it could as easily be 0 as 38, we just didnt have the data to conclude that last part
    3) Hasci by standard advises a max of 3 HST's, if HST would work, the average patient could go over 20x to HASCI
    3) None of the celebs went more than a few times to HASCI, even while they all claim to be extremely vain and there current result looks like they need thousands of graft more. Just look at Frans Bauer, he has the typical 'extremely thin cover' HST look: http://www.showbizzsite.be/nieuws/fr...eloven-1225497 It looks just ridiculous in the sun !!
    4) HASCI hasn't been able to demonstrate a single case of something that wouldnt have been possible with FUE
    5) Dr Aaron Gardner claims it's impossible do to what Gho claims to do
    6) Several known doctors say it's BS what Gho does, they've tried it and it didnt work.

    And you say "Look Gaz donor looks good so it must work". Now who is biased here ?

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    so you Arashi, I am sure you could do another three or four HST, and still look OK, densify your top and wait for the grail for your 50th birthday!!!

    the point is, life goes on, time flies, what do we do in between? the cure is not yet there, HST is not the cure, but the best option for rich people for now...

    time will look less rough on the waiting queue if you can start the reverse with HST.... the HM will be the cherry on your cake!!!

    I think like that because I am almost the same age as you... time ****in flies!!! what do we want?

    cure available for you being 18 years old will be for the kids who are 10 years old now!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    + in his donor, the area that looks weaker is the one where he had a scar!!!!!not from HST


    seriously... gaz has results he deserved for so much helping us, he will go for another 1400 and then, maybe another, can you imagine his general result with another two?

    he will look great and enjoy some good appearance with resurrected haircut!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    what I am claiming is that he was already below average before even touching his donor... then, he did procedures on the very same area + not respecting the 9 months, twice in a row... and still he looks really really good, and I am not biased.

    it's just that when it's good, we can also say it... and they still give green light for it.

    Imagine him, being average of above average donor, having multiple procedures with the 9 months fully respected, he would even look better then now!!!

    so yes, with his starting from, he looks sort of pristine to me!!! cause, he was below average, he got procedure on same very spot from donor, he did not respect the security delay for regeneration and still he looks very good with a strong flash on his donor in a bathroom after multiple procedures.

    Leave a comment:

Working...