World Hair Congress 2015

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It's2014ComeOnAlready
    replied
    Originally posted by dus
    You could be making the exact same statement in the year 2025, so it's kinda pointless/ dumb.
    It's more pointless and dumb to be making the argument you are, because there will be a number of new treatments before that time. You're just whining about what's in your day-to-day consciousness.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigentries
    replied
    Originally posted by Hairismylife
    Only a totally nonsense person would say Replicel is dead.
    Btw Swooping doesnt want anything to work. Clearly he has had a hair transplant or he works for HT doctors. I've never seen he show optimistic about a stuff, even if it's back up by solid science or professional researcher.
    It's called being realistic. It's stupid to think a bald guy wouldn't want a cure.

    But science doesn't work that way. Things either work or not, faith is irrelevant

    What has "optimism" brought to the community? Besides being an easy target to snake oil salesmen?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hairismylife
    replied
    Only a totally nonsense person would say Replicel is dead.
    Btw Swooping doesnt want anything to work. Clearly he has had a hair transplant or he works for HT doctors. I've never seen he show optimistic about a stuff, even if it's back up by solid science or professional researcher.

    Leave a comment:


  • Keki
    replied
    Ah yes the dead replicel, so dead with his multimillion trial in 2 continent sponsored by the world largest cosmetic company

    Leave a comment:


  • Scientalk56
    replied
    Originally posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
    You're describing a sense or feeling. In reality, we are much closer to new treatments, and as time progresses, more is discovered. Saying that 2 years ago, things looked better makes no sense, because it is the past. In the grand scheme of things, we are 2 years closer to anything new.
    Sadly its not the case . MANY companies that were showing promising aporoaches are now kinda dead (Acell, Replicel, histogen, and bitmorpost on its way)

    Leave a comment:


  • dus
    replied
    Originally posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
    In the grand scheme of things, we are 2 years closer to anything new.

    You could be making the exact same statement in the year 2025, so it's kinda pointless/ dumb.

    Leave a comment:


  • It's2014ComeOnAlready
    replied
    Originally posted by Swooping
    I'll give you that Mr. Bimatoprost. We are closer to curing cancer too. We are also closer to buying new organs in the supermarket. On top of that we are closer to a pill that will transform you into Lazar Angelov. Exciting huh .
    So, you'd rather be in 2013 then?

    Enough with your bellyaching.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swooping
    replied
    Originally posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
    In the grand scheme of things, we are 2 years closer to anything new.
    I'll give you that Mr. Bimatoprost. We are closer to curing cancer too. We are also closer to buying new organs in the supermarket. On top of that we are closer to a pill that will transform you into Lazar Angelov. Exciting huh .

    Leave a comment:


  • BiqqieSmalls
    replied
    Originally posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
    In the grand scheme of things, we are 2 years closer to anything new.
    +1

    Leave a comment:


  • It's2014ComeOnAlready
    replied
    Originally posted by bigentries
    He is right. All of the WHC threads years before were heavily expected, specially before Histogen released phase II results. I think one of the motivations to send someone last year was the feeling that some of the things said there weren't released to the public.

    I would say 2013 was the worst year, 2015 just looks to be a very boring one. It's like we are in the mid-2000's again, a lot of "promising" companies that are years away from showing anything
    You're describing a sense or feeling. In reality, we are much closer to new treatments, and as time progresses, more is discovered. Saying that 2 years ago, things looked better makes no sense, because it is the past. In the grand scheme of things, we are 2 years closer to anything new.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigentries
    replied
    Originally posted by It's2014ComeOnAlready
    This comment makes no sense.
    He is right. All of the WHC threads years before were heavily expected, specially before Histogen released phase II results. I think one of the motivations to send someone last year was the feeling that some of the things said there weren't released to the public.

    I would say 2013 was the worst year, 2015 just looks to be a very boring one. It's like we are in the mid-2000's again, a lot of "promising" companies that are years away from showing anything

    Leave a comment:


  • It's2014ComeOnAlready
    replied
    Originally posted by Swooping
    One thing is for sure it looked a heck of a lot better 2-3 years ago.
    This comment makes no sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • It's2014ComeOnAlready
    replied
    Originally posted by Scientalk56
    This is worst year for hairloss progress
    Asinine statment

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Scientalk56
    This is worst year for hairloss progress
    Yep.

    Much research. Very encouraging. Such competence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swooping
    replied
    Originally posted by Scientalk56
    This is worst year for hairloss progress
    One thing is for sure it looked a heck of a lot better 2-3 years ago.

    Leave a comment:

Working...