The Evidence for PRP (including growth factors)
Collapse
X
-
Justinian, after how long did you start noticing results with PRP? I started my first treatment January 2, 2015. Since then, I've had 3 more treatments, so four in total. So right now, I'm at the 3.5 month mark. -
Basically this.
Just basing off what I remember reading, Minox gives ~20% re-growth on average and many people say it doesn't work (some are probably legitimate non-responders). PRP in studies gives 10-15% if I remember correctly. This is a difference but not a huge difference and it won't always be noticeable. Also many studies are done after repeat treatments. You can't go into into it thinking a single treatment will have some miraculous results, so people's expectations are too high. And to top it off the price of it sets people's expectations too high.
If the money is surplus money, it's probably worth it. If you have to save for it, it's probably not worth it.
Lastly, if you search on clinicaltrials.gov there are several ongoing trials for PRP. It will be interesting to see the results. What I think is very promising is that PRP could provide long term maintenance. There will probably never be a study done on that though.Leave a comment:
-
Horrible methodology or outright lying
I put lasers and Nizoral in that list too. "Proven" treatments that lack any sort of anecdotal evidenceLeave a comment:
-
I've been doing PRP since January 2015. Did four sessions, one month apart, overall. My last session in early april included ACell. I'm not taking fin / minox. Just doing oils and dermarolling, among other natural things. My regimen hasn't changed since January. The only thing I started doing differently since then was that I started blowdrying my hair. Not sure if the blowdrying is responsible, and it may still be too early to tell, but I feel I've slowly lost hair over the past few months. Definitely don't see any new hairs.Leave a comment:
-
Most of the people on this forum have said that PRP has done nothing for them or even accelerated their hair loss. Yet, scientific studies consistently show some small effect of PRP. What do you think explains this discrepancy? I'm genuinely curious.Leave a comment:
-
I want to know why in few years this prp treatment exploded everywhere in the world, cheap money or what? I still have to read a positive reviews with the same regrowth of a decent repsonder of propecia or minox
It's like the ozone therapy, i don't know if it works or not, i will never spend money on that, it's a coincidence no top surgery or researcher use them? I don't think so, maybe it can give you better hairs thoLeave a comment:
-
Just wanted to give my 2 cents work. I had this done in December. THey told me the full results would be noticeable within 3 months. Im now at 4 months and there have been no benefits at all. Matter of fact, my hair loss has accelerated faster than ever. Cant say for sure it was the PRP, but really fishy timing that my hair loss increased 3 months after the procedureLeave a comment:
-
Id say I've regrown a little. Not a lot, but a little that's probably only noticeable to me. Also, remember I was on nizoral which has been proven equal to minoxidil 2% in a study.Leave a comment:
-
Also it was just a two hour drive for me. Way less of a hassle than any other treatment. Multiple treatments are probably better too.
And by thick hairs I meant I have a couple dozen hairs that got much thicker and stand out. Not a cosmetic difference but I can notice it was doing something.Leave a comment:
-
It's all relative. 1k isn't that much to me and I don't want to nuke my body to fix my hair.You're grasping for straws in your experience with PRP.
What you describe is not worth the $1k+ this treatment is to do. It's just not and I'd bet you would agree. Slightly thick hairs at the hairline? Dude, PRP did not create those. Seriously? Don't let the OP throw away valuable cash. Have him use our experiences as a way to dodge this.
Honestly, to the OP, do what you want...but you have been warned. It is not worth the expense and hassle. The results are no way aesthetically pleasing and very difficult to even notice.Leave a comment:
-
You're grasping for straws in your experience with PRP.I had it with Greco and noticed slightly thicker hair throughout, some thick hairs at my hairline, and a bunch of tiny hairs at my temples. Not a huge difference but I could notice it. My only other treatment was nizoral. I also shed a lot throughout which to me means it was doing something.
What you describe is not worth the $1k+ this treatment is to do. It's just not and I'd bet you would agree. Slightly thick hairs at the hairline? Dude, PRP did not create those. Seriously? Don't let the OP throw away valuable cash. Have him use our experiences as a way to dodge this.
Honestly, to the OP, do what you want...but you have been warned. It is not worth the expense and hassle. The results are no way aesthetically pleasing and very difficult to even notice.Leave a comment:
-
Justinian, did you essentially maintain the same amount of hair you had when you had the treatment to 6 months after the treatment?Leave a comment:
-
I had it with Greco and noticed slightly thicker hair throughout, some thick hairs at my hairline, and a bunch of tiny hairs at my temples. Not a huge difference but I could notice it. My only other treatment was nizoral. I also shed a lot throughout which to me means it was doing something.Leave a comment:
-
Yes, and with $1k less in my bank + travel. It literally did nothing. My shedding slightly increased and it did nothing in the form of a positive. I was desperate and willing to try anything. I don't regret it, but would never recommend it or do it again.
Pure scam IMHO.Leave a comment:
-
It's weird that he publishes results showing that it works, and independent (presumably) researchers are also publishing results showing that it works.
When you say it didn't work, did you continue to lose hair at the same rate?Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: