low systemic absorption technology

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence
    What the hell are you saying Arashi? Dutasteride, like finasteride, sucks at regrowing lost hair for stuff which, for you, equals a 'cure'. And why would a topical regrow hair any more effectively than the oral alternative......
    But dut and fun are pretty effective as maintenance options. If you then combine that with a fue, you're 'cured' as long as you are not beyond a nw5 of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Awesome find indeed ! Topical dut without sides would indeed pretty much equal a cure for most of us
    What the hell are you saying Arashi? Dutasteride, like finasteride, sucks at regrowing lost hair for stuff which, for you, equals a 'cure'. And why would a topical regrow hair any more effectively than the oral alternative......

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    i think this is a really good idea because this is something we could get NOW.
    I agree man. It's actually the most promising news for a short term solution that I've heard in ages ! I agree that it's very possible that no safety trials are even needed, since the medicines are already approved and theoretically we could have a topical Fin or Dut without sides before the end of the year IF indeed turns out trial testing is not needed (and of course IF it actually even works). But this is really hopeful and exciting news !!

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    As I was the one who discovered this, I emailed them before even posting on the forum. Furthermore, I'm a medical student at a top 5 university in the world, so emailing from my academic email account would catch the attention of just about anyone in the medical field.

    I agree, however, that we should have a doctor contact them and try to formulate their own topical treatment using their technology.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    You guys need to think before you start firing off emails....

    what is in it for them? keep this in mind while you're drafting. Also, try not to sound like a total bald crazy person...

    Were better off emailing legit docs/academics/investors/companies who can then contact these guys. I doubt a few crazy bald guy emails will make them change their 12 month strategy overnight... or at all.

    I suggest people begin a contact list of docs/companies/investors/etc and then we have the least crazy forum member do the emailing

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    I've emailed them twice with no response. Maybe someone should put in a call.

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    I would like to see them try topical spiro and compare the results back to the normal stuff everyone commonly uses. I think cosmo tested CB and topical spiro and got much better results with that more advanced delivery system. Topical spiro might work like a charm if delivered properly and its already tested for topical use the chemical itself. Everyone assumes topical spiro is weak and doesnt work but it could easily just be the vehicle

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    So,any response yet ?if not i Will try Tomorrow to contact them

    Leave a comment:


  • cichlidfort
    replied
    Originally posted by burtandernie
    Its funny because I posted a while ago about wondering why a company doesnt focus on vehicles and then license it to companies so every company doesnt reinvent the wheel. Its not like developing a vehicle is some simple thing to do but every company spends time/money inventing their own each time kind of silly
    Hopefully this helps but might be a bit early to say. Cant be bad though for MPB since its a topical problem.
    I'm baffled that no one has still yet to find an efficient vehicle for CB yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    Its funny because I posted a while ago about wondering why a company doesnt focus on vehicles and then license it to companies so every company doesnt reinvent the wheel. Its not like developing a vehicle is some simple thing to do but every company spends time/money inventing their own each time kind of silly
    Hopefully this helps but might be a bit early to say. Cant be bad though for MPB since its a topical problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    5. Alert a few doctors: Rahal, Hasson and Wong, Dr. Wesley, Dr. Cole, Dr. Greco, Dr. Bauman...people who are highly respected and on the progressive end of the industry. They could contact this company and find out how to do it and have a pharmacy make it for them so they can prescribe it.
    +1

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by cichlidfort
    So are we all going to stay complacent here with our dicks out or are we going to make a group effort to propagate our "cutting edge" idea in regards to utilizing an already established hair loss drug (dut or fin) with this technology. And, if this worked, how would millions of men have access to this slow absorption technology? Wouldn't they have to mass produce this? Wouldn't that alone take years to do?
    User 'Inbrugge' said on the previous page he contacted the company. Let's see if he gets a reply before we all start mailing them and all ask the same question.

    Leave a comment:


  • cichlidfort
    replied
    So are we all going to stay complacent here with our dicks out or are we going to make a group effort to propagate our "cutting edge" idea in regards to utilizing an already established hair loss drug (dut or fin) with this technology. And, if this worked, how would millions of men have access to this slow absorption technology? Wouldn't they have to mass produce this? Wouldn't that alone take years to do?

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by NeedHairASAP
    four options:

    1. Alert them of this obvious market, hope they move on the insight

    2. Get ahold of Merc, Cosmo, other companies-- or people into early stage medical investing--- and hope they license the tech to make these products

    3. One of the more legitimate users could start a crowdfund campaign to fund a company that would license their tech for use-- may want to inquire about the ballpark cost of licensing

    4. alert kane, or other foreign chemist, to attempt to reverse engineer this
    5. Alert a few doctors: Rahal, Hasson and Wong, Dr. Wesley, Dr. Cole, Dr. Greco, Dr. Bauman...people who are highly respected and on the progressive end of the industry. They could contact this company and find out how to do it and have a pharmacy make it for them so they can prescribe it.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    four options:

    1. Alert them of this obvious market, hope they move on the insight

    2. Get ahold of Merc, Cosmo, other companies-- or people into early stage medical investing--- and hope they license the tech to make these products

    3. One of the more legitimate users could start a crowdfund campaign to fund a company that would license their tech for use-- may want to inquire about the ballpark cost of licensing

    4. alert kane, or other foreign chemist, to attempt to reverse engineer this

    Leave a comment:

Working...