-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by gmonasco
In other words, your jerk ass behavior has now inconvenienced everyone.
no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
-
Originally Posted by 2020
no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
-
Originally Posted by 2020
no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place.
Your behavior more than merited your banishment.
It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
Adults are expected to exhibit a higher standard of behavior than the "Mommy, he did it first!" excuse.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....
-
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.
-
Originally Posted by 2020
so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....
I guess it wasn't that obvious and they will learn the hard way. My prediction is they grow short, thin, unpigmented vellus hairs.
-
Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
-
Originally Posted by cleverusername
Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more
argumentum ad verecundiam
would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
argumentum ad hominem
-
Originally Posted by gmonasco
How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.
Haha ! it's unbelievable that people take that clown ironman seriously. His posting has reached a feverish pitch lately. He's getting more and more panicked the more people start to pay attention to replicel. I've never seen a more blatant case of someone having an incomplete understanding of the literature, or worse, someone who's cherry picking quotes from select papers to support his preformed ideas.
-
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
argumentum ad verecundiam
Of course, those who understand the proper meaning of the term would know that it's a valid inductive argument, not a logical fallacy.
Similar Threads
-
By Westonci in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 10
Last Post: 09-02-2011, 04:11 AM
-
By Flowers in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 5
Last Post: 06-04-2011, 09:55 AM
-
By Thebaldone1 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 3
Last Post: 05-08-2011, 09:03 PM
-
By Wanthair in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 09-04-2010, 01:48 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks