Replicel

[VictimOfDHT]

Pretty simple. Their retraction was nothing more than them trying to cover their backs and prevent an inevitable law suit after all the rumors that their share value was going to skyrocket or something. NOTHING in the retraction said anything about their ongoing research. I don't know how some people here interpreted that as a declaration of failure and a white flag. Chill, people.
This is coming from a self-declared "pessimist" -even though I don't believe in such a thing as pessimism or optimism- but yeah, the retraction had NOTHING to do with their research or results and one does not need to be a genius to see that.