Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clandestine
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 2005

    Great share, Maradona. Thanks for the read.

    Originally posted by Maradona
    NBT: You have made it clear that assuming you have the clinical data to prove your procedure is the new standard in hair regeneration you will seek to sell the division in its entirety to a multi-national Big Pharma player. Why?

    DHall: The biotech space is growing again…Big Pharm/Big Bio have BIG PROBLEMS with their patent cliffs and there is only so much M&A they can do at the high end. So, they have begun to change their strategies by partnering and acquiring technology further upstream.
    This part made me uneasy for some reason, however.

    Comment

    • Maradona
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 830

      Originally posted by southasian
      Personally i'm seriously doubting any of these companies will come with a solution by 2015. I remember 2 years ago i read that Aderans would complete Phase II by end of last year - 2011. Lo and behold, we are into 2012 and now they say they're planning on completing Phase II in 2013!!! I once read that Dr. Rassman from baldingblog.com got many negative comments on his site after stating that hair cloning is very far away, and wouldn't be ready for another 10 years (Dr. Bernstein says the same thing). I see now what he meant. There is no way in hell i'll ever see a semi-full head of hair in my life, at least not in the youthful years that it will matter. Hair transplant probably isn't a good solution either, as one small strip from the donor area in the back will never be enough to cover an eventual Norwood 7 in my case. I'll just shave my head and live life. By the time these useless bastards release a solution, i'll be too old to care for it. God forsaken useless bastards!
      be optimistic mate, imo. Replicel is the only solution for you and for me, the only problem is money and time. If replicel doesn't work, nothing else will, but that's my opinion after LONG LONG reading and studying.

      Let's just hope there's no stopping to replicel.


      On a Side note: replicel's stock is MOVING ON UP! ...to the east side...

      Comment

      • Follicle Death Row
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 1066

        Originally posted by clandestine
        Great share, Maradona. Thanks for the read.



        This part made me uneasy for some reason, however.
        This should actually reassure you. There is no reason whatsoever that Big Pharma would bury such a treatment if they could have it themselves to make billions. This is the next Lipitor in terms of profits if it does what it says on the tin. Think $20 billion a year not 5. A lot of people are scared of HTs and think they're a scam so imagine the real interest if this works.

        Comment

        • clandestine
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 2005

          Originally posted by Follicle Death Row
          This should actually reassure you. There is no reason whatsoever that Big Pharma would bury such a treatment if they could have it themselves to make billions. This is the next Lipitor in terms of profits if it does what it says on the tin. Think $20 billion a year not 5. A lot of people are scared of HTs and think they're a scam so imagine the real interest if this works.
          True, perhaps my skepticism is unfounded. Something about the wording 'Big Pharma' is just slightly off putting for some reason. Thanks for the perspective.

          Comment

          • DepressedByHairLoss
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 876

            South Asian, I agree with you that it is so damn frustrating when these companies keep pushing back their timelines. Sometimes I wish that these companies were founded by men suffering from hair loss because only some one who directly suffers from hair loss really knows how devastating hair loss can be for a person. Those who don't suffer from it can't understand it, I know this first hand. If the founders of some of these companies really understood the devastation of hair loss, then they perhaps would be more determined to get something out to us as quickly as possible, knowing that it is unbearable for us to live even a few more years longer with this baldness shit. I really wish that these companies would at least put out some interim treatment to tide us over until a true cure is found. With regards to Rassman, he's totally full of shit. He always says that hair multiplication and new treatments/cures are so far away. He only says this shit for his own benefit. He's afraid that if he says something like "hair multiplication" is right around the corner", then people will forego his hair transplants and wait for more effective treatments or a cure. He wants more people to get hair transplants (preferably with him) so downgrades all of these new potential treatments so people will rush off and get a hair transplant with him. He honestly makes me sick.
            That being said, I really do believe that we have to remain positive. I believe that Replicel has better methodology than Aderans, because their methodology has been researched for longer, their projections are higher, and their scientists are some of the best in the world. I don't believe that Aderans even had those high hopes. I really like what Histogen was doing as well. And there might even be people in the Far East using stem cells to regrow hair that we're unaware of. For example, I remember a Japanese scientist named Mariko Yamaki who was attempting to use mesenchymal stem cells to regrow hair. I really wish that we had many more people/companies working on a hair loss cure.

            Comment

            • born
              Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 66

              I really want replicel to succeed because they will update us and not keep us in the dark like the other companies.

              Comment

              • sausage
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 1064

                Originally posted by Kiwi
                If that is aimed at me... where is the link to the persons just going of the facts?

                Back then Histogen had not forseen the issues with the FDA. You're talking pre phase 1 bro. You havent even mentioned that fact that some jerk face pharmaceutical company tried to kibosh them and took them to court hence massively stalling them.

                You're still linking us to meaningless outdated information.

                For your own happiness I suggest reading / focusing on the current and up to date information and facts. Like I said what is important to notice now is that your links were pre phase 1 trials.
                Ohh rite....this Replicel potion must all be 100% true then.

                Nothing should slow or halt Replicels progress in treating baldness.

                We will all be cured in maybe 3 years time.

                Comment

                • StressedToTheBald
                  Inactive
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 452

                  If there were a true cure, I wouldn't care for a moment which company comes up with it, as long as does, and if it were anything in somewhat decent future.. as I said before, I probably won't be too eager or alive enough to inject anything when I turn 80.

                  Comment

                  • gmonasco
                    Inactive
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 883

                    Originally posted by 2020
                    Do you think that if you take four aspirins instead of two, your headache will go away twice as fast?
                    uhm, actually yes.
                    Then you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

                    dumb example. watch this video:
                    No, it's a good example with a dumb answer.

                    It's just a conceptual video; nothing about it demonstrates that the treatment will necessarily be compoundable.

                    Comment

                    • ccmethinning
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2012
                      • 326

                      And there is nothing to suggest it won't be compoundable.

                      In better news, Replicel was up 30% today to $2.60/share on convincing volume.

                      Comment

                      • sausage
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 1064

                        Originally posted by ccmethinning
                        And there is nothing to suggest it won't be compoundable.

                        In better news, Replicel was up 30% today to $2.60/share on convincing volume.

                        I know nothing about shares etc. How do they work? how much would I need to put into a Replicel share to see a decent return if Replicel became huge?

                        Comment

                        • StressedToTheBald
                          Inactive
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 452

                          Originally posted by sausage
                          I know nothing about shares etc. How do they work? how much would I need to put into a Replicel share to see a decent return if Replicel became huge?
                          If shares go up You'd earn, but if they gown down - You'd loose money.

                          Comment

                          • UK Boy
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 244

                            RepliCel Provides Quarterly Update on First-in-man Clinical Trials
                            January 30, 2012

                            By RepliCel on January 30, 2012

                            VANCOUVER, BC – January 30, 2012 – RepliCel Life Sciences Inc. (the “Company” or “RepliCel”) (OTCBB: REPCF) is pleased to report that the six-month post injection follow-up period of its TS001-2009 clinical trial is nearing completion.

                            To date, 17 of 19 subjects have had their six-month follow-up visit, during which time subjects had their overall health evaluated. This included subjective and objective assessment of verum and placebo injected sites and digital images were taken of the scalp and injection areas. The digital images will be used to assess any treatment response and any post-injection changes in scalp health compared to baseline and between the two treatment areas. The remaining two patients are scheduled to complete their follow-up visits before the end of March. Four patients will complete 12-month follow-up visits in that same time frame.To date, no serious adverse events have been reported post injection in any of the 10 men and 9 women participating in the study.

                            The TS001-2009 study team will be performing a thorough review of the collected study data throughout the months of March and April 2012. Once complete, the treatment groups will be revealed (‘un-blinded’) to the data analysis team and the data will be analyzed. RepliCel remains on schedule to release the initial review of efficacy results in April 2012.

                            Subject efficacy at 6-months post injection is the first step in measuring a treatment response. All subjects will continue to participate in the post injection follow-up period of the study until August 2013 and a review of final safety and efficacy results will commence before the end of 2013. The continued follow-up period is a key component of the study to confirm treatment safety profile and response trends at 6, 12 and 24 months.

                            The initial data from RepliCel’s 6-month subject follow-up will be used in the Company’s Investigational Medical Product Dossier (IMPD), which is presently being developed for a Phase IIb dose-ranging clinical trial of 100 patients that is expected to commence in fall 2012. The protocol will be submitted to the EMEA, FDA and Health Canada for review. A final decision on the location of the trial is pending.


                            Forgive me if I'm misreading this but this means that 4 of the subjects are almost a year post treatment and when Replicel presents it's results it will actually have an idea of 12 month results as well as 6 month although it will not present them?

                            Comment

                            • sausage
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2012
                              • 1064

                              Originally posted by StressedToTheBald
                              If shares go up You'd earn, but if they gown down - You'd loose money.
                              I guess if say I chucked £50 into some Replicel shares and the company makes it big time with this treatment my money could increase big time.

                              Say the company became a billion dollar business how much would my £50 go up by?

                              Comment

                              • Maradona
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2011
                                • 830

                                Originally posted by sausage
                                I guess if say I chucked £50 into some Replicel shares and the company makes it big time with this treatment my money could increase big time.

                                Say the company became a billion dollar business how much would my £50 go up by?
                                depends dude you should read the report by tobin smith. Anyways let me know if u find out how to buy and then SELL the stocks. I want to buy the stocks too.

                                Comment

                                Working...