Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maradona
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 830

    Originally posted by WashedOut
    Whether it works or not it was always going to be about 5 years away according to the CEO. Most of these treatments won't come for another 3 years at least due to the FDA and other factors. Best case scenario Aderans would be out in 2014.
    CEO said 2015 if everything goes well. They don't have a plan B or C like Aderans, so theyre going all out on phase 1.

    If it shows the same results as rats or at least a little less (as well as it should since we are not implanting rat cells in our scalp ), then by 2015 we will have the cure for baldness and a complete change in society forever, we are dealing with the discovery of the universe as joe in baldtruth said .

    Now there might be downsides, since you might have to inject really high doses of these treatments (your own cells) and there isn't a side effect in the literature of treatments like these....we might have a real ****ed up side effect who knows.

    I will keep posting IF I find more info about replicel, if not then we'll see each other in march

    Here's a pdf document with all the info about replicel.




    I really believe this is our only chance to get a full head of hair within our lifetimes, some may disagree But I don't believe in aderans or histogen, maybe aderans but prob won't be as effective from my research.

    Good luck guys, cross fingers, hopefully everything goes smooth in March even 20-30% would be good.

    Comment

    • Kampung101
      Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 48

      Originally posted by Sogeking
      Agreed. These are all interim treatments. The real cure in a form of a pill or a topical which will somehow deactivate genes responsible for DHT sensitive hair, or make the hair follicels themselves DHT resistant is decades away.
      Not necessarily. In both Aderans and Replicel, they are taking dht resistant cells from the back of the head. Theoretically, these dht resistant cells not only create new hair follicles that are dht resistant but the implanted dht resistant cells will migrate to existing hairs on the head sensitive to dht and in turn make them resistant. If either of these treatments prove successful and can do the above mentioned things, why would you need a new treatment that deactivates the genes when the hairs are now resistant to dht?

      Comment

      • Kampung101
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 48

        I think some baldtruth members that are quite knowledgeable on this (like Krewel or Pate) need to create some type of thread that provides in a list format the available info on Replicel and explanation of what the process is theoretically trying to achieve. Because there is still a lot of confusion on here about numbers like 20-30%, the reasons for why they are using a high amount of cells in phase 1 etc.

        If the confusion still stands, the excessive amount of optimism or cynicism that people complain about is just going to continue, along with misinformation.

        Comment

        • 2020
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1527

          Originally posted by clandestine
          Around $15,000?
          that's not the point... I tried to explain that with MULTIPLE injections, hair growth will be compoundable. There will be no limit.

          Comment

          • BoSox
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 708

            Will they know if this will be compoundable from their first data, or will this come later in the trails? I hope it is, because % would not be an issue (:

            Comment

            • WashedOut
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 112

              Originally posted by BoSox
              Will they know if this will be compoundable from their first data, or will this come later in the trails? I hope it is, because % would not be an issue (:
              I hope they answer that too. I can't understand why it wouldn't be compoundable but who knows how these things work out. Even 30% is pretty good, still better than dealing with surgery and you could use a thickener to make it look more like 60%+. Also, once it becomes a proven technology it will advance so it could reach much higher percentages with time.

              Comment

              • alex123
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2011
                • 12

                The stock price of this company continues to plummet, against the trend of the market which has been upwards. It seems likely that some insiders are selling off their shares.

                Comment

                • Have Hope3
                  Junior Member
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 15

                  Originally posted by alex123
                  The stock price of this company continues to plummet, against the trend of the market which has been upwards. It seems likely that some insiders are selling off their shares.
                  Alex, this stock drop does seem to be a bit troubling. I hope it is just some day trading going on but the volume of trades per day seems to be way up. The stock did end the day on a upswing! Cmon RepliCel pull through for us!

                  Comment

                  • ccmethinning
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 326

                    I'm not sure if the rule applies to small, OTC companies like Replicel, but don't insiders have to file before they sell their shares?

                    Comment

                    • Maradona
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 830

                      Guys the stock plummeting is kinda worrisome and the leak info is probably fake. I've talked to one representative of replicel , he said there's no way information has been leaked, since its a double placebo bla bla bla something along the lines.

                      Keep hope alive guys, just come back in march, this company could be the next microsoft !

                      Unless they didn't use the correct injection procedure.....there's nothing to worry about...yet.

                      and About Aderans....they had a bunch of trials....they still were going to finish phase 2 next year...that was no news. But I don't think their procedure is as good as replicel at least in theory, they're now doing trial and error...hopefully replicel doesn't have to go through that or we are !@*#ed.

                      Comment

                      • PinotQ
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2010
                        • 188

                        Several of us posted on this about a week ago and the stock price has indeed continued to fall. It is now at about a 12 month low. I have been accumulating shares over the last year so I have followed this closely. It is discomforting to see the stock price falling this close to the release of the trial results as I would have expected it to be trending in a positive direction. However it is very difficult to definitively read anything into this. There are about 44 million shares outstanding with about 24 million of those shares that have been granted to upper management locked in a trust (they begin to be released quarterly after Q1 2012). That leaves about 20 million shares currently available for trading. So unless upper management has purchased shares on the market, they would not likely be selling. On January 6th 2012, the stock closed at $2.40. It closed at $1.80 yesterday representing a 25% drop in less than a month. The average number of shares traded using a moving 10 day average is currently just over 9,000 shares traded per day. It was much less than this prior to January 6th. This represents about .04% of the stock trading per day. If you multiply this amount by the number of days the stock has been trading since it began to drop on Jan. 6th, only 180,000 shares or .75% of the 24 million shares available to be traded, have changed hands during this downward swing. So relatively speaking, this is insignificant. At the same time, the types of "insiders" that could potentially be trading in the stock is also probably insignificant. For example, the trial participants, employees associated with conducting the trial, etc. While the trial is double blinded, the company conducting the trial has already reported to Replicel that there have been no adverse events. It could easily have also reported to Replicel that they see no visible evidence of any difference in regrowth between the 2 test sites on each of the subjects scalps. So it's anybody's guess as to why the stock is dropping. If there is insider trading, I do not believe that it is by upper management or those in control of the company. They seem to be very well run, professional and organized. So if there is insider trading it would have to be those on the periphery.

                        Comment

                        • PinotQ
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2010
                          • 188

                          Correction, The above post should read: " is currently just over 9,000 shares traded per day. It was much less than this prior to January 6th. This represents about .05% of the stock trading per day."

                          and

                          " ....only 180,000 shares or .9% of the 20 million shares available to be traded...."

                          Comment

                          • born
                            Member
                            • Nov 2011
                            • 66

                            Originally posted by PinotQ
                            Correction, The above post should read: " is currently just over 9,000 shares traded per day. It was much less than this prior to January 6th. This represents about .05% of the stock trading per day."

                            and

                            " ....only 180,000 shares or .9% of the 20 million shares available to be traded...."
                            so ? is this bad ?

                            Comment

                            • MackJames
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 165

                              Originally posted by Maradona
                              Guys the stock plummeting is kinda worrisome and the leak info is probably fake. I've talked to one representative of replicel , he said there's no way information has been leaked, since its a double placebo bla bla bla something along the lines.

                              Keep hope alive guys, just come back in march, this company could be the next microsoft !

                              Unless they didn't use the correct injection procedure.....there's nothing to worry about...yet.

                              and About Aderans....they had a bunch of trials....they still were going to finish phase 2 next year...that was no news. But I don't think their procedure is as good as replicel at least in theory, they're now doing trial and error...hopefully replicel doesn't have to go through that or we are !@*#ed.

                              This technology is literally untested and Replicel, in its current incarnation, a relatively new company. Some investors might consider the market for a product like this to be limited, which is in my opinion extremely short sighted on their part. Many investors might be hesitant to gamble on this stock until some kind of results are published, which is another major mistake.

                              As an investor myself, these kind of companies can be pretty attractive, but are admittedly a serious risk. Investing in a company while they are small and haven't attracted much mainstream attention could lead to big returns if the product works. If you are going to buy, I would recommend doing so before the results of phase I of the clinical trials are released, but be prepared to lose your money if the results are a bust. Investing is a risk but taking risk is what makes the millionaires. Rule of thumb, never invest more than you are willing to risk, and be prepared to lose money.

                              Comment

                              • PinotQ
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2010
                                • 188

                                Great advice MackJames! That is exactly my strategy. I am fully prepared to lose it all and, if so, it won't hurt too much. But I think you could search for a long time before you find something with an upside like this. Given the emotion attached to this issue and the fact that by most accounts less than 2-10% seek treatment for lack of something that really works, and throw in the female market and you have an incredible upside.

                                Born, My point here is that 99% of the shares have not been sold over this downturn so that is a plus indicator if you are rooting for Replicel.

                                Comment

                                Working...