It is interesting that the shaved head has become popular in modern times - at least in America. When I was growing up (I am 34), it was an absolute no no. Often considered a Nazi emblem or sign of chemo-induced sickness, one would never shave his head under any circumstances. Cultural trends change, however, as well as minds.
The comb over, which was embraced in the 1970's through 1990's (and still sometimes used today) was a very common phenomenon. Men (who were bald/balding) would simply grow their hair long on the sides and flop it (perhaps with gel) over the top of the head to give the appearance of a fuller head of hair. Now, however, this trend (or crime!) is tantamount to committing perjury in a federal court; further, it is one of the most (if not the most) mocked social/fashion elements of modern society. The satire of the bald man's comb over is unending, and rather caustic. However, in reality, how is the comb over any different from a shaved head? Well, you may say, it is different because head shaving is about acceptance, whereas the comb over is about denial. I understand that argument; however, I have heard many head shaving men admit they are shaving, among other reasons, because they want to be bald by choice; in addition, they say hairloss is less noticeable this way. However, isn't the latter the intention of a comb over? Isn't the idea to make hairloss look less noticeable? There appears to be some flawed logic here.
Some would argue that a man with a comb over is insecure; they'd say he just cannot accept his hairloss; therefore, he is pathetic. This may be true - but many head shavers cannot accept the fact that they are naturally bald either. They want to be considered part of the 'trend' instead of accepting themselves the way they are. Some, however, shave because they want to look younger, feel better or just forget about hair altogether. Sometimes, bald men shave because they flat-out look better than with the disproportioned horseshoe. Some men with comb overs just want to have hair on their heads so they can recognize their faces when they look in the mirror - which is understandable.
In summation, I believe that there is not one answer to my original question. Some men shave because they cannot accept their natural hairloss; in contrast, others shave because they look better that way. I do not believe that men with comb overs ought to be ridiculed any more than fellas who shave their heads - because they are in denial about their genetics. Why is either type of man necessarily ridiculed? The problem I see is the notion that there is some difference between the two groups; there is not.
The comb over, which was embraced in the 1970's through 1990's (and still sometimes used today) was a very common phenomenon. Men (who were bald/balding) would simply grow their hair long on the sides and flop it (perhaps with gel) over the top of the head to give the appearance of a fuller head of hair. Now, however, this trend (or crime!) is tantamount to committing perjury in a federal court; further, it is one of the most (if not the most) mocked social/fashion elements of modern society. The satire of the bald man's comb over is unending, and rather caustic. However, in reality, how is the comb over any different from a shaved head? Well, you may say, it is different because head shaving is about acceptance, whereas the comb over is about denial. I understand that argument; however, I have heard many head shaving men admit they are shaving, among other reasons, because they want to be bald by choice; in addition, they say hairloss is less noticeable this way. However, isn't the latter the intention of a comb over? Isn't the idea to make hairloss look less noticeable? There appears to be some flawed logic here.
Some would argue that a man with a comb over is insecure; they'd say he just cannot accept his hairloss; therefore, he is pathetic. This may be true - but many head shavers cannot accept the fact that they are naturally bald either. They want to be considered part of the 'trend' instead of accepting themselves the way they are. Some, however, shave because they want to look younger, feel better or just forget about hair altogether. Sometimes, bald men shave because they flat-out look better than with the disproportioned horseshoe. Some men with comb overs just want to have hair on their heads so they can recognize their faces when they look in the mirror - which is understandable.
In summation, I believe that there is not one answer to my original question. Some men shave because they cannot accept their natural hairloss; in contrast, others shave because they look better that way. I do not believe that men with comb overs ought to be ridiculed any more than fellas who shave their heads - because they are in denial about their genetics. Why is either type of man necessarily ridiculed? The problem I see is the notion that there is some difference between the two groups; there is not.
Comment