Spencer Kobren Interviews Dr. Jerry Cooley | ACell MatriStem Plucked Hair

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • abb83
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 28

    #31
    i jsut dont get it

    maybe it's because english it's not my first language but if you have a transplant then the donor site is stitch back together, where does the new clonned hairs will appear??

    Comment

    • utah23
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 11

      #32
      I'm so impressed that Dr. Cooley is taking the time to answer these questions. News like this is very exciting and I am sure he is being flooded with questions and phone calls. Like everyone else, I am excited for this breakthrough.
      I mean absolutely no disrespect to Dr. Cooley when I say that we have all learned to take news like this with a grain of salt. The hairloss industry as a whole is really a scary place. It eases my mind that Spencer seems to be excited about this and I also noticed that respected surgeons like Dr. Bernstein and Dr. Rassman have blogged about their excitement as well.
      I don't personally know any of these men though and when you look at us as a group of hairloss sufferers on this forum, we are small. I hope that I am not crazy to get excited about something I read on a small forum on the internet. (again, no disrespect intended).
      The point of my post is that, if this were all true (which it very well could be, as far as I know Spencer and Dr. Cooley have good track records) wouldn't it be receiving some more major national news coverage? Does anyone know if it has and if I have just missed it? It just seems like news as big as successfully creating hair follicles where there weren't any before would be talked about in more places than on bald truth talk.
      I mean ABSOLUTELY no disrespect with this post. I am as excited to see the results of Dr. Cooley's work as anybody else. I think that I can speak for a lot of us when I say that hair loss can be exhausting and I have become a little bit of a sceptic.
      One more thought... I know that Dr. Hitzig was heavily involved in this as well and from things I have read about him, he doesn't have a great reputation. I know that this is the internet and people can say anything about anyone and remain anonymous but this still worries me. Any input from anybody would be great.

      Comment

      • Fixed by 35
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 618

        #33
        I think the lack of news coverage may be because this is a cosmetic procedure. In much the same way as gastric bands et al never made the headlines, nor has this. FUE only reached the British press early this year as far as I can tell, when it was already being offered to patients.

        Certainly, the British media will only cover what they perceive as a miracle. Now, don't get me wrong, if this works it is a miracle. But the British press will only consider a magic pill or potion worthy of coverage, rather than cosmetic surgery.

        Comment

        • ryan555
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 428

          #34
          You're doing the Lord's work, Dr. Cooley. I am so glad there are doctors with the cojones to move technology forward instead of just sitting back and accepting the status quo. Keep pushing forward.

          Comment

          • Skywalker
            Member
            • Oct 2010
            • 63

            #35
            Potentially Fantastic News

            It is very hard not to get very excited by this, but I have seen so many 'false dawns' that I am trying hard to retain my usual scepticism

            Thanks for posting Dr Cooley and for trying to move things forward for us, if this new hair can be delivered consistently and cycles properly with donor dominance then you and Dr Hitzig (good reputation or not) will have changed the hair loss restoration industry forever. It would mean that for the first time people with poor donor like me can consider an HT transplant a real possibility instead of an impossibility.

            Comment

            • utah23
              Junior Member
              • Aug 2010
              • 11

              #36
              I'm sure that I am not the only one who has been thinking a lot about this news recently. I really want to believe that we are seeing a light at the end of the tunnel (overdramatic ha ha).
              I have been wondering, since the big presentation at the ISHRS conference, if there are plans to study the ACELL technology in a more aggressive way? Weren't there clinical trials that tested thousands of men using Propecia before it was approved? Even with the clinical trials that Histogen is now involved in, it seems that there is a plan to get their product to the consumer as fast as possible.
              With Acell (since it is already FDA approved), it kind of seems like there are just a couple of doctors experimenting with the stuff in their clinics with trail and error. I wonder if there was more of a program, doctors got on board and really aggressively tried to make this work, if it could become a realistic option in a quicker amount of time. Something similar to the clinical trial programs that we are all so used to hearing about. Not telling anybody how to do their job, just wondering if anybody has heard of any programs that are being created to more aggressively study this technology. Thanks

              Comment

              • Jonathan
                Member
                • Oct 2010
                • 59

                #37
                Dr Cooley,
                I am writing from Sweden, and I am very excited over Your promising research results. Are you planning to build out Your organisation, train new surgeans etc, to meet the request that will come from all over the world?
                In short, when do you think a person like me will get access to this new technique?
                Yours sincerely
                Jonathan

                Comment

                • KeepTheHair
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1215

                  #38
                  Does Acell change anything for someone with more than enough donor? Or is it just good for people that need to have several HTs with only minimal donor.


                  I don't really see how this changes everything although it definitely is a big step.

                  Comment

                  • mlao
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 387

                    #39
                    Originally posted by KeepTheHair
                    Does Acell change anything for someone with more than enough donor? Or is it just good for people that need to have several HTs with only minimal donor.


                    I don't really see how this changes everything although it definitely is a big step.
                    I think you should CAREFULLY read the interview it implies that in theory a person could have an unlimited donor supply. You pluck a hair from the donor area which grows back, you apply the acell to the plucked hair, you implant that hair and it produces a new hair.

                    Comment

                    • clee984
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 254

                      #40
                      I was so excited by this news that I went out and got drunk last night.

                      Don't get me wrong, I go out and get drunk every night, but I am still vibrating with excitement because of this news. Unlimited donor hair is a cure, as far as I'm concerned. It's all gravy.

                      Comment

                      • KeepTheHair
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2010
                        • 1215

                        #41
                        Originally posted by mlao
                        I think you should CAREFULLY read the interview it implies that in theory a person could have an unlimited donor supply. You pluck a hair from the donor area which grows back, you apply the acell to the plucked hair, you implant that hair and it produces a new hair.
                        I think if you CAREFULLY read my post you will know that you don't answer my question.






                        I am just saying, unlimited donor is only important if you need big, big transplants done. Not so? I admit I don't fully understand everything. But I doubt this changes much for me since I don't need that many grafts. This will only make a HT more expensive for me. For a norwood 4+ this is definitely good news though.

                        Comment

                        • mlao
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 387

                          #42
                          You are young and everyone on this site has been supportive to you from your first post.
                          If you were 45 and there was no other cure available to you this would be the Holy Grail.
                          Nobody can truly predict future hair loss I have seen guys who were perfect, thick NW1s until the reached 40 and then in a matter of 4 years became NW4s. This is truly a break thru but I guess a guy like me will never be as smart as you!!!

                          Comment

                          • KeepTheHair
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 1215

                            #43
                            lol What are we even arguing about.


                            I agree this is a huge huge step in the right direction. This might even make some completely bald people(that have a lot of money) into norwood 3-2's again. This is really good.


                            I am just not that full of hope at all right now. This doesn't change anything for me. I can't afford to travel to get a HT and then pay for it also. Even if I could... FUE has bad yield and FUT has room for too much complications. HTs aren't that great right now at all in my opinion... This is still a HT. Just a more complicated one for someone with donor.


                            I am being a ass probably. But I also try to help people here. I doubt we all come here when we are full of optimism about life and all that.

                            Comment

                            • mlao
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2009
                              • 387

                              #44
                              Originally posted by KeepTheHair
                              lol What are we even arguing about.


                              I agree this is a huge huge step in the right direction. This might even make some completely bald people(that have a lot of money) into norwood 3-2's again. This is really good.


                              I am just not that full of hope at all right now. This doesn't change anything for me. I can't afford to travel to get a HT and then pay for it also. Even if I could... FUE has bad yield and FUT has room for too much complications. HTs aren't that great right now at all in my opinion... This is still a HT. Just a more complicated one for someone with donor.


                              I am being a ass probably. But I also try to help people here. I doubt we all come here when we are full of optimism about life and all that.
                              You should look at it in perspective; In the late 50s and early 60s when Dr. Orentreich began performing transplantation it was akin to science fiction.
                              In the 80s when Minoxidil became available and proved to be effective it was another advancement and in the late 90s when FUT and Finasteride were introduced even better advancements.
                              Acell while in its infancy might move the ball forward like the above mentioned therapies.
                              One of the major complaints of guys who get transplants done is the limited availability of donor hair and the scaring.
                              If this is perfected and there is less or no scaring and more donor hair I call that a big step forward.
                              While it is early days yet the hair restoration community seems to be looking into this in a big way. Since the announcement I have seen two highly respected doctors post on their blogs that they are starting to experiment with Acell.
                              Hair loss is an ongoing condition and until someone or some company releases a product that can halt it in its tracks we will continue to look at ways to prevent it.
                              I don't want to sound rude but this forum is not just about you. It's a community where ideas, opinions, and advancements are discussed by everyone.

                              Comment

                              • PayDay
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 604

                                #45
                                I’ve been a big fan of Spencer Kobren for many years now but I seldom take the time to thank him for what he does for all of us. THANKS SPENCER for helping all of us get through this crazy hair loss thing! Dr. Cooley I’m very exciting about this breakthrough, thank you for keeping us posted here. I missed you on Spencer’s show last Tuesday, will you be doing another show because I would like to call in to ask you a couple of questions?

                                Thank you again!
                                Paul

                                Comment

                                Working...