+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 117

Thread: Induchem

Hybrid View

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Wasn't this the same website and reporter that said the LOreal's latest snake oil was the cure for hairloss?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dazza View Post
    Wasn't this the same website and reporter that said the LOreal's latest snake oil was the cure for hairloss?
    Even if, they're not related to the product.... unless....???

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    I wouldnt even think about this until that study and some evidence pops up. How does that old saying go? If it sounds too good to be true it probably is?
    If this works evidence will certainly turn up either proving it does or more likely probably does not before everyone wastes their money making them rich for selling snake oil

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    I would wait for more information to be available and to see that study that was published in the journal before even thinking about this. Need to see more proof it does anything before wasting money on this I mean we all know 98 percent of stuff like this turns out to be a joke.
    At least as effective as minox based on what? There is no evidence except that study they talk about which means nothing. You have to see the actual study and how it was conducted to see how well it was done. I can run a study in my basement or at some local place doesnt mean its legit. Even small studies can be wrong or biased.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Pentarou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Britain, Great
    Posts
    484

    Angry

    Sounds like a cosmetics product (not a medication) with pseudoscientific marketing. So basically, another Neogenic.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    191

    Default

    "up to 28200 hairs" and "better than hair transplant" are rather bold claims

    There's no way this is legit. If such thing really existed, it wouldn't be revealed only month before release. Besides, there's no pics, no studies, no anything.

    Also keep in mind that 1 hair also falls into "up to 28200 hairs" category

    And they put a comma in 28,200 so perhaps they meant 28,2

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    191

    Default

    I found this:

    http://www.sofw.com/content/news/InduchemNeocapyl.pdf

    Lol, the results are pathetic.

    It's minox on steroids if anything.

    Nothing to see here.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Pentarou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Britain, Great
    Posts
    484

    Default

    Laughable before/after photos too. And not a good sign that the sales spiel invokes greenwash, that's too similar to herbal supplements for my liking.

  10. #10
    Senior Member HairBane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    300

    Default

    Yep, confirmed bollocks.

    /thread

    Anyone who comments below this line is an idiot.


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth