-
Yeah who ******ing cares. I'm voicing for those who can't take Propecia; we're frustrated.
Everyone is frustrated, but those of us unable to take DHT inhibitors due to sides are entirely frustrated.
-
To reiterate, and in case someone missed it;
Originally Posted by clandestine
Desmond mate; Not unwilling. No.
Those unable. There are those of us who have been willing, have taken fin, and have been proven unable. Many of us cannot tolerate finasteride, and other DHT blockers. We're left with few options.
Sorry, but this distinction is terribly important.
-
In next 5 years, my only hope lies in CB to be honest. And if I cant tolerate FIN anymore, I will try RU, bcs there is nothing beside RU and FIN that could save your hair atm.
I only take FIN bcs I hope CB comes out in 4-5 years, if CB fails, my whole plan fails and I will probably shave my head. 4-5 years is the maximum I want to take FIN.
-
Originally Posted by yan
In next 5 years, my only hope lies in CB to be honest. And if I cant tolerate FIN anymore, I will try RU, bcs there is nothing beside RU and FIN that could save your hair atm.
I only take FIN bcs I hope CB comes out in 4-5 years, if CB fails, my whole plan fails and I will probably shave my head. 4-5 years is the maximum I want to take FIN.
Dude why are u so negative, what about Gho and Scarless FUE?
-
Originally Posted by stayhopeful
Dude why are u so negative, what about Gho and Scarless FUE?
Really? How much will that cost us, then. Only tens of thousands? Lovely.
-
Originally Posted by Desmond84
Unfortunately Propecia will be our only effective weapon against hairloss for at least another 5 years
Wasnt this always the case until histogen comes out?
-
Originally Posted by stayhopeful
Dude why are u so negative, what about Gho and Scarless FUE?
Bcs I dont believe in Gho and scarless fue is useless? It doesnt solve the problem with limited donor?
-
I think you guys are reading too much into this one data point. Total hair count is not as important as terminal hair density. These treatments aren't there to create new follicles de novo, but revitalize miniaturized follicles. Furthermore, the trend has not been a clear decline, but has oscillated. At 12 and 24 weeks we see an increase, at 36 we see a decrease, but at 48 we see an increase. It's not a consistent decline at all.
-
Originally Posted by Desmond84
Unfortunately Propecia will be our only effective weapon against hairloss for at least another 5 years
What a deflating, yet true statement. Depressing.
That means a slow death for my hair because I'll never touch FIN again. Sucks to be balding with no hope in sight.
-
Originally Posted by StayThick
What a deflating, yet true statement. Depressing.
That means a slow death for my hair because I'll never touch FIN again. Sucks to be balding with no hope in sight.
Yes I`m sorry. Without FIN or at least RU to maintain what you have, there wont be any hope... It sucks so hard.
If you lose too much hairs until Replicel / CB whatever comes out, not even HT + Replicel + CB can save you anymore.
Its all about maintaining now. But is it worth taking the risks and live with side effects for years just to maintain in order to benefit from possible future treatments? Hard to say... :/
Similar Threads
-
By tbtadmin in forum Histogen's Hair Stimulating Complex (HSC)
Replies: 15
Last Post: 09-04-2018, 10:00 AM
-
By Scoots in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 06-20-2012, 06:28 PM
-
By sebasmarin in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 04-11-2011, 11:19 AM
-
By Dr. Lindsey in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-28-2010, 07:46 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks