 |
|
07-17-2012, 02:39 PM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave123
Men are more shallow and I don't know how you guys can even say the opposite. I'm laughing out loud at the vanity here. Men reject women on 29373990 factors.
|
The problem with these kinds of discussions is that men judge themselves (and other men) by male standards, then project those standards onto women. So when men say "women are shallow," they're really referring to standards which are important to men, not necessarily to women.
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 04:43 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 553
|
Woman == 26-30+
Man == 30+
You will of course find outliers, but I think the majority of (American) men and women fit this roughly. When you're young you hardly look past the looks. It takes men longer then women to stop that though.
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 10:35 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,054
|
People say the reason women wear loads of make-up and make such an effort is because men are shallow -
I think they've got that backwards (FemDom programming), they do it because they're psychotically obsessed with external appearances, their never-ending obsession with retail shopping, handbags, money money money shoes, designer watches, jewellery, cosmetics and plastic surgery by the barrel load isnt "because men love looking at them wear said items" - it's BECAUSE they believe nothing beyond looks and material possessions matter. Take a trip down your local retail centre and see how many stores have the mens section at the front and the ladies section at the back lol - you wont find any.
- It's sexist to create media based upon the above stereotype - but to make cartoons surrounding stupid fat bald men is perfectly accepted, politically correct and will make you MILLIONS (The Simpsons)... even boys are attacked, Bart is the dumb naughty boy that doesnt get anywhere in life and Lisa is the genius... seriously, what a crock of shit.
It's only ever politically correct to point at a woman like she is a trophy when she has achieved a similar feat to the types of accomplishments men make on a daily basis, and to place the blame of the underachievements of the majority of her gender on the "oppression invoked by evil naughty men throughout history" - give me a break.
America is a feminist-led Orwellian nightmare for men.
http://www.youtube.com/user/manwoman...e=results_main
Red pill plzzzzz
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 11:37 AM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Europa
Posts: 1,185
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UK_
People say the reason women wear loads of make-up and make such an effort is because men are shallow -
I think they've got that backwards (FemDom programming), they do it because they're psychotically obsessed with external appearances, their never-ending obsession with retail shopping, handbags, money money money shoes, designer watches, jewellery, cosmetics and plastic surgery by the barrel load isnt "because men love looking at them wear said items" - it's BECAUSE they believe nothing beyond looks and material possessions matter. Take a trip down your local retail centre and see how many stores have the mens section at the front and the ladies section at the back lol - you wont find any.
- It's sexist to create media based upon the above stereotype - but to make cartoons surrounding stupid fat bald men is perfectly accepted, politically correct and will make you MILLIONS (The Simpsons)... even boys are attacked, Bart is the dumb naughty boy that doesnt get anywhere in life and Lisa is the genius... seriously, what a crock of shit.
It's only ever politically correct to point at a woman like she is a trophy when she has achieved a similar feat to the types of accomplishments men make on a daily basis, and to place the blame of the underachievements of the majority of her gender on the "oppression invoked by evil naughty men throughout history" - give me a break.
America is a feminist-led Orwellian nightmare for men.
http://www.youtube.com/user/manwoman...e=results_main
Red pill plzzzzz
|
All Western nations have been under the increasing influence of cultural marxism and radical ideologies such as feminism since at least the 1950's. Plenty of people see this, but many are too afraid to do anyting about it because of political correctness. It's the perfect storm, really.
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 11:45 AM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highlander
All Western nations have been under the increasing influence of cultural marxism and radical ideologies such as feminism since at least the 1950's. Plenty of people see this, but many are too afraid to do anyting about it because of political correctness. It's the perfect storm, really.
|
Male disposability has existed since the dawn of time. Seats in lifeboats, burning buildings, who goes to war, who gets to eat... men are always placed last.
Feminists latched onto left-wing movements such as civil rights and racial equality campaigns - brandishing the kitchen as a concentration camp and proclaiming the men who were dying down mines and working brutal 16 hour shifts in factories & foundries were somehow "liberated".
Those same feminists recommended even the dissolution of the male human species in place of sperm banks, the early movement was led by some really screwed up & radical women - you could compare feminism more to Nazism, as it unfairly promotes and denies advantage based upon the genetic code of the individual as opposed to their performance. Feminism is not about equality, it is about the never-ending pursuit of female supremacy, much like other forms of genetic based supremacy (white supremacy, black supremacy, green eyes supremacy).
They were given their liberty and invited into the corporate world, their response? They largely hated it, because they saw how shit it was, it shows given the fact that 1 in 4 professional women in America is currently on anti-depressants or receiving some sort of counselling for stress/anxiety.
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 12:15 PM
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 220
|
Men and women both have the right to feel extremely sad because of hair loss. I sympathize with all men/women with hairloss, as I have gone through it myself, and know the pain firsthand.
May a cure be there that is free of side effects.
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 02:22 PM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Europa
Posts: 1,185
|
I'm not doubting a lot of what you said. It's no secret that cultural marxists used feminism and various other agendas to further advance their cause. I don't care what anyone says, I still hold doors open, give my seat up for women, and would gladly give up a seat in a lifeboat. However politically correct what I'm about to say might be, women are weaker and deserve a form of extra care for that alone. Because of their role in child birth and child rearing they also require a different role in society. Pretending everyone is completely equal is nothing but a farce - and this applies for far more things than just gender roles in society.
Nonetheless, what really annoys me is the women of my generation who believe not working to raise children is a death sentence. What on earth could be more important than raising our future generation? Children aren't some kind of burden, but many are starting to feel that way. And with that mentality comes the plumetting birthrates of Western Europe.
Do you have a link to something on that statistic you quoted about professional women? I am not totally surprised by that, as stats for women who have done military service shows a statistically higher amount of mental and physical problems than their male counter-parts. It would be interesting if this also carried over into the professional world.
Of interest to you may be to learn that in many places the EUSSR (commonly known as the European Union) is trying to encourage a 50/50 male-female split amongst boards of directors in European countries. They wish to encourage this by quite literally forcing people to hire X amount based on gender. What ever happened to personal merit?
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 06:57 PM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,054
|
Personal merit has gone through the window, watch this video, this politician is 29 years old and is the minister of finance for the UK treasury, she even admits that she was HANDED her job on equality grounds and ushered to the top because they needed more women in those departments.
This is how she performs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4wGp9UoXLc
She hasnt got a fcking clue and these are the people running our country - this is the result of "equality" - it should be never based on your genetics only what you can do and how you can do it!!!!
Im all for more women in higher positions... IF THEY CAN EARN THOSE POSITIONS THROUGH ACTUAL PERFORMANCE!!!
Manwomanmyth is one of the best YouTube channels that addresses the feminist nightmare societies formulating in the west, I know most men can feel it around them lol - they're just too scared to speak up.
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 07:15 PM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,054
|
Oh I forgot to add the source for the 1 in 4 statistic I used.
It can be found here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1098023.html
I think it was Medco Health Solutions that conducted the study, but the number is likely to be higher, given that a lot of people dont actually bother to seek treatment, I dont think women are generally happy with their new-found 'equality' lol - I just had some woman complaining about how she has to pay all her own bills, I told her this is what you asked for so enjoy.
But on a deeper level, feminism can also be considered as a neo-liberal economic concept to heighten the exchange of wealth, accelerating divorce rates (fracture the family unit) also being another ugly branch of this agenda - they want money going directly into the hands of those who will spend it - this is one of the reasons why mammalian influence in society has been totally demolished - no more male-led trade unions and employment rights all legislated through corporate contracts (the control of human resources) - that's all we are under neo-liberalism, just human resources. And all of us will be doped up on anti-depressants in our lovely feminist utopia, this is why I used the term "feminist nightmare" - im not exaggerating lol .
|
|
|
07-18-2012, 07:40 PM
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,087
|
I somewhat agree. If a man sees an attractive woman who looks like she's gone through a bit of hair loss, but still has decent amount of hair, we do not care about the hair loss. And mind you, hair loss is devastating for women, more than us men. They really take it hard, it could just be hair loss from damaging their hair with chemicals or burning their hair, something they can actually cure, and they would go crazy. Woman pattern baldness will drive a woman nuts. But men do not care about this as long as they're attractive. Women make more of a big deal of balding men.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» The Bald Truth UK |
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Newest Videos |
|
|
|