Originally Posted by Maradona
The fact is histogen has provided cosmetically acceptable results with PHOTOS.
Where are those photos?
I know about the close up pics, and that's fine, as we really want scientific proof, but to say they delivered "cosmetically acceptable results" is absurd. Those are areas about an inch in size, we don't even know what do they look like to the naked eye at a considerable distance, the real measurement of cosmetic achievement
My advice, if people are really uncomfortable with their hair situation, and have the money, don't waste your time thinking about a treatment that might not even come out.
I've been lurking hairloss forums since 2008, and the most optimistic acted the same way at the imminent Intercytex results. And you can also go back a few years before to see how people said that HTs would be obsolete in 5 years. Do you really want to lose a decade of your life feeling sorry about your baldness?
I still haven't seen a picture of a cosmetic improvement with experimental treatments. For me, the situation is probably the same as 2007, except we have around 3 companies releasing the same close ups and data.
Not being pessimistic, just being realist, even if tomorrow someone produced a treatment that can turn an NW7 to NW0 without a doubt and without the need for clinic trials, it would still be a couple of years away from commercialization.