 |
|
05-03-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 897
|
Replicel NW7 to NW1!!!???
how come Gho is the only one who has to turn NW7s to NW1s to "prove" his procedure?!
FUE doctors can get more than 3% regrowth just accidentally transecting like gho LOL
So why does replicel get its proverbial balls lathered by this forum?
p.s.-- this is not an empty or negative comment. I'm trying to discuss why GHo is held to a different standard than replicel
if you have an explanation....please leave it
be specific... aka don't just keep saying "you dont understand" "they are positive" over and over and over
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 05:14 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 231
|
Because RepliCel isn't a commercially viable procedure available today.
Gho is.
A NW7 - NW1 from Gho would cost $50,000-100,000 and take almost a decade to complete.
Replicel doesn't have a price because it doesn't yet exist as a treatment.
You have to hold products to the standard that their price commands. Gho commands a lot.
Replicel is only an idea at this point.
This is really a pointless thread.
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 05:22 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
Replicel doesn't have a price because it doesn't yet exist as a treatment. You have to hold products to the standard that their price commands. Gho commands a lot. Replicel is only an idea at this point.
|
Gho hasn't turned any NW7's into NW1's yet, so that procedure equally "doesn't exist as a treatment" and "is only an idea at this point."
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmonasco
Gho hasn't turned any NW7's into NW1's yet, so that procedure equally "doesn't exist as a treatment" and "is only an idea at this point."
|
That is true. But on 5/3/2012, the prospect of Gho being able to do is seems quite a bit better than Replicel being able to do it.
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 05:28 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
But on 5/3/2012, the prospect of Gho being able to do is seems quite a bit better than Replicel being able to do it.
|
Maybe, but nobody here gets excited about any other promised treatment whose proof of concept is at least ten years away.
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Player vs Hair
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmonasco
Maybe, but nobody here gets excited about any other promised treatment whose proof of concept is at least ten years away.
|
have you ever stopped to think why you're constantly engaging in arguments with everyone on tbt?
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 06:17 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
|
I don't think it's good to turn this into some type of competition between Gho and Replicel. They're both possible treatments and we'd all like to see progress in the hair restoration industry. There is no need to divide the hair loss forums between supporters of different treatments, which is unfortunately something that appears to be happening.
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 06:38 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Schrodinger's Box
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedHairASAP
how come Gho is the only one who has to turn NW7s to NW1s to "prove" his procedure?!
FUE doctors can get more than 3% regrowth just accidentally transecting like gho LOL
So why does replicel get its proverbial balls lathered by this forum?
p.s.-- this is not an empty or negative comment. I'm trying to discuss why GHo is held to a different standard than replicel
if you have an explanation....please leave it
be specific... aka don't just keep saying "you dont understand" "they are positive" over and over and over
|
When is your procedure scheduled for with Gho?
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 07:00 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 267
|
I’ve read this forum every single day for the past couple of years and I have never read one person even hint to the idea that the only way Gho can prove that HST works is if he turns a N7 not an N1. This is a ridiculous statement. Where do you poisonous people get this stuff? Please show me where you read this on the forum? Why do you people have to try to either destroy every discussion, with your poisonous attitude or instigate with ridiculous untrue conspiracy crap? Enough already! Gho doesn't have to prove anything to anybody. If you want to have a transplant by Gho, just do it. There is no conspiracy against Dr. Gho around here!
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedHairASAP
how come Gho is the only one who has to turn NW7s to NW1s to "prove" his procedure?!
FUE doctors can get more than 3% regrowth just accidentally transecting like gho LOL
So why does replicel get its proverbial balls lathered by this forum?
p.s.-- this is not an empty or negative comment. I'm trying to discuss why GHo is held to a different standard than replicel
if you have an explanation....please leave it
be specific... aka don't just keep saying "you dont understand" "they are positive" over and over and over
|
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 10:24 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,375
|
The rate at which you're making new threads is redundant.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Replicel
|
depressed17 |
Cutting Edge / Future Treatments |
2047 |
05-10-2013 01:40 AM |
|
Replicel - FAIL
|
Kiwi |
Cutting Edge / Future Treatments |
51 |
05-05-2012 06:31 PM |
|
Replicel 2012
|
Artista |
Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic |
4 |
04-04-2012 07:24 AM |
|
Replicel ?
|
john2399 |
Hair Loss Treatments |
12 |
02-20-2012 02:58 PM |
|
» The Bald Truth UK |
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Newest Videos |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:35 PM.