Histogen – TrichoScan analysis vs. side-by-side comparison

[534623]

Originally Posted by SoClose

... could it not be argued that what is deemed to be FUs in the "wrong position" is actually just growth of new hair?

No - no way!
Compare the pics of both trail subjects (S2018 vs S1016) again:



Subject 2018 IS definitely the same area, same trail subject. It’s simply obvious – actually at a glance. This is clearly not so with trail subject 1016, because WHERE are the existing terminal hairs/FU’s from the baseline pic in the 3 month pic?

Furthermore, a specific pattern/positioning of follicular units (FU’s) DOESN’T dramatically change not even after decades (like your nose - your nose will always be in the middle of your face!) – especially not that extreme just within 3 month (!!) as shown in the after pic of S1016. So again, where is the existing pattern/positioning of all EXISTING thick terminal hairs of the baseline pic in the 3 month pic? As you can SEE yourself, this is –of course- not so with trail subject S2018. S2018 neither changed its FU-pattern in general, nor a change of the positions of the existing terminal hairs/follicular units - what finally made a side-by-side comparision possible and pretty easy.

A certain pattern of follicular units is like a FINGERPRINT!
S1016 = NO MATCH!

[2020]

^ all of those problems could have been solved if Histogen just gave us a simple table instead of 8 pages of vague graphs:

                 3 months            6 months
Subject 1:         25%                  40%
Subject 2:         42%                  58%
Subject 3:         33%                  64%
...

now all we got is two data points from best possible results which have been exaggerated to the max...

[lurker77]

Originally Posted by 534623

No - no way!
Compare the pics of both trail subjects (S2018 vs S1016) again:



Subject 2018 IS definitely the same area, same trail subject. It’s simply obvious – actually at a glance. This is clearly not so with trail subject 1016, because WHERE are the existing terminal hairs/FU’s from the baseline pic in the 3 month pic?

Furthermore, a specific pattern/positioning of follicular units (FU’s) DOESN’T dramatically change not even after decades (like your nose - your nose will always be in the middle of your face!) – especially not that extreme just within 3 month (!!) as shown in the after pic of S1016. So again, where is the existing pattern/positioning of all EXISTING thick terminal hairs of the baseline pic in the 3 month pic? As you can SEE yourself, this is –of course- not so with trail subject S2018. S2018 neither changed its FU-pattern in general, nor a change of the positions of the existing terminal hairs/follicular units - what finally made a side-by-side comparision possible and pretty easy.

A certain pattern of follicular units is like a FINGERPRINT!
S1016 = NO MATCH!

Oh, Ironman.