Does this bristly mouse hold the secret cure to baldness?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2020
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 1527

    #31
    Originally posted by gmonasco
    In other words, your jerk ass behavior has now inconvenienced everyone.
    no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions

    Comment

    • ccmethinning
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 326

      #32
      Originally posted by 2020
      no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place. It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
      He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.

      Comment

      • gmonasco
        Inactive
        • Apr 2010
        • 883

        #33
        Originally posted by 2020
        no dude.... they shouldn't have banned me in the first place.
        Your behavior more than merited your banishment.

        It was Iron Man who was ruining all discussions
        Adults are expected to exhibit a higher standard of behavior than the "Mommy, he did it first!" excuse.

        Comment

        • 2020
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1527

          #34
          Originally posted by ccmethinning
          He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
          so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....

          Comment

          • gmonasco
            Inactive
            • Apr 2010
            • 883

            #35
            Originally posted by ccmethinning
            He just debunked RepliCel. More like ruining all hope.
            How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.

            Comment

            • ccmethinning
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 326

              #36
              Originally posted by 2020
              so you think he knows more about how this works than Replicel??? Why would Replicel even bother with human trials if it was that obvious that it won't work....
              I guess it wasn't that obvious and they will learn the hard way. My prediction is they grow short, thin, unpigmented vellus hairs.

              Comment

              • cleverusername
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2011
                • 214

                #37
                Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...

                Comment

                • ccmethinning
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 326

                  #38
                  Originally posted by cleverusername
                  Huh, you'd think Replicel's team of scientists that STUDY hair loss would know more
                  argumentum ad verecundiam

                  would know more than some idiot sitting in his basement pulling stuff off google...
                  argumentum ad hominem

                  Comment

                  • The Alchemist
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 265

                    #39
                    Originally posted by gmonasco
                    How sad that all those scientists at Replicel wasted so many years and millions of dollars researching, developing, and testing a treatment for hair loss, when spending just a few minutes with Google would have informed them that it couldn't possibly work.

                    Haha ! it's unbelievable that people take that clown ironman seriously. His posting has reached a feverish pitch lately. He's getting more and more panicked the more people start to pay attention to replicel. I've never seen a more blatant case of someone having an incomplete understanding of the literature, or worse, someone who's cherry picking quotes from select papers to support his preformed ideas.

                    Comment

                    • gmonasco
                      Inactive
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 883

                      #40
                      Originally posted by ccmethinning
                      argumentum ad verecundiam
                      Of course, those who understand the proper meaning of the term would know that it's a valid inductive argument, not a logical fallacy.

                      Comment

                      • 2020
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 1527

                        #41
                        Originally posted by ccmethinning
                        argumentum ad verecundiam

                        argumentum ad hominem

                        Comment

                        • cleverusername
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2011
                          • 214

                          #42
                          Whatever, let ironman and his followers/ believers think what they want about Replicel. We all know that if works they'll be first in line waiting for treatment.

                          Comment

                          • Mojo Risin
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 157

                            #43
                            Originally posted by BoSox
                            "Scientists in Japan have given hope to bald heads everywhere. They've successfully grown hair on hairless mice, making the cure for baldness possible in as little as the next three years."


                            3 years now? This has to be good news, it's not 5, or 10.
                            It's 3 years TO GET TO HUMAN TRIALS.

                            So maybe in 2020.

                            lol.

                            Comment

                            • Delphi
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 546

                              #44
                              Originally posted by 2020
                              this ain't a cure.... they're simply multiplying follicles and implanting them back to your scalp. Nobody needs BRAND NEW follicles. Just revive existing ones
                              Are you serious? This would be a cure for everyone, from burn victims, to accident victims to people with MPB and more.

                              Comment

                              • 2020
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 1527

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Delphi
                                Are you serious? This would be a cure for everyone, from burn victims, to accident victims to people with MPB and more.
                                no dude... they have to implant each "cloned" follicle INDIVIDUALLY to a person's scalp..... do you know how long it would take to "reconstruct" a full NW1? MONTHS!

                                Comment

                                Working...