 |
|
08-06-2012, 06:58 PM
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amadeus
You Gho guys are so very thick. There was never a court case! What on earth would they have taken Gho to court for, bullshitting people? What you are linking to is a retraction letter that was obviously written by Gho’s attorneys since the same exact letter was signed by multiple parties who apparently complained about Gho’s advertising to some state authority. They signed that document to avoid being sued by Gho. It happens all the time. There was never a court case this is just a retraction letter that these doctors and others were bullied into to signing. You people are ridiculous! Let’s see the court documents. Where are they? They do not exist.
|
From HASCI's website (all information can be found by clicking 'News' then 'File: Hair Stem Cell transplantation'):
Quote:
August 2010: HSI wins legal action with advertising code committee!
On 15 July 2010, HSI successfully defended itself before the Advertising Code Committee (RCC) against a complaint which had been submitted by a number of hair transplantation clinics in regard to the claims by HSI. This complaint was the most recent episode in the series of attempts by those clinics to discredit HSI. The immediate cause for the complaint concerned the HSI-claim of ‘hair multiplication’ as a result of the Hair Stem Cell Transplantation ® patented by HSI. Supposedly, there was no evidence for the hair multiplication claim. The complainants were:
Transhair BV
Aesthetic Team BV
Laser Surgery
Prohairclinic
Hairplus Medical Care
After hearing both parties and experts, the Committee reached the judgment that HSI had substantiated the claims sufficiently and that the complaint was therefore ruled unfounded.
The additional complaint that the well-known Dutch entertainer Gerard Joling had ‘linked his name’ to HSI was brushed aside as irrelevant.
|
Quote:
March 2011: board of appeal ruled in favour of HSI after legal action!
Following the decision by the Advertising Code Committee on 10 August 2010, Transhair B.V., Aesthetic Team B.V., Laser Surgery, Prohairclinic and Hairplus Medical Care appealed that decision by the Board of Appeal. But, once again, the ruling was in favour of the Hair Science Institute. And this time the decision is binding. The apparent frustration of aforementioned clinics in regard to the success of our Hair Stem Cell Transplantation® is an on-going story of accusations. All grievances were thoroughly refuted by Prof. Neumann of the Erasmus Medisch Centrum (Erasmus Medical Centre) and Dr Coen Gho of HSI. In addition, HSI’s claim of ‘hair multiplication’ was supported by Prof. P. van Zuijlen, Burn Medicine VUMC and Dr C. Lafaire, Medical Department, Head of the Burns Unit (Antwerp, Belgium).
The questions that, among others, Transhair has raised on its website in regard to our patented method have made it clear to us that there were good reasons for us to patent Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®.
You will find the complete judgment by the Board of Appeal plus the judgment of the Advertising Code Committee of last year which initiated this new appeal in the pdf below.
|
Pretty clear cut case to me. Spin it any way you want but that's Dr. Feriduni's name on that retraction and that speaks very loudly.
|
|
|
08-06-2012, 07:07 PM
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 267
|
There's no spin, there was never a court case. You just proved it with this post!! How can you not see that? There was a complaint filed with the advertising committee and the committee found it to be inaccurate. That’s it. There was a settlement and these guys had to sign a retraction. There was never a court case! So why do you keep posting that these guys took Gho to court? You are making yourself out to be extremely naive if not unintelligent. Can’t you read? It’s all there in black and white.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJJJrS
From HASCI's website (all information can be found by clicking 'News' then 'File: Hair Stem Cell transplantation'):
Pretty clear cut case to me. Spin it any way you want but that's Dr. Feriduni's name on that retraction and that speaks very loudly.
|
|
|
|
08-06-2012, 07:13 PM
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amadeus
There's no spin, there was never a court case. You just proved it with this post!! How can you not see that? There was a complaint filed with the advertising committee and the committee found it to be inaccurate. That’s it. There was a settlement and these guys had to sign a retraction. There was never a court case! So why do you keep posting that these guys took Gho to court? You are making yourself out to be extremely naive if not unintelligent. Can’t you read? It’s all there in black and white.
|
This guy is talking about uncivilized discussion...  Do you read the crap you post?
Please stop acting dense, everything is crystal clear for anybody who wants to read what was posted. You're more interested in supporting your agenda and arguing semantics.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» The Bald Truth UK |
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Newest Videos |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 PM.