baldness treatment may lie in stressed hair follicles

[UK_]

Originally Posted by gmonasco

It's easy to "solve" problems when you have the power to indiscriminately kill anyone you want.

And you're only allowed to have that power if you're wearing the stars an stripes... right?

Cuz yaaaall know best? guh'huh?

The Taliban were forced to take up arms, you'd be forced to take up arms if the KGB/Russian mafia and communists were peddling drugs/prostitution rackets throughout your neighbourhood, has anyone described to you how "gentlemanly" a communist Afghan treats a woman?

Here's a hint: rape is forbidden in Islam, but in communism, anything goes.

In fact, even the Americans agreed with this... and consequently funded and trained a group... CALLED THE TALIBAN... to fight communism! Rolf

[25 going on 65]

Originally Posted by UK_

Here's a hint: rape is forbidden in Islam, but in communism, anything goes.

lol I hope this is a joke. The devil on Highlander's shoulder would be envious.

[UK_]

Originally Posted by 25 going on 65

lol I hope this is a joke. The devil on Highlander's shoulder would be envious.

Highlander was right - Hitler was leading his people out of the grips of the Jewish global banking cartel - who cares about his comments regarding how jews will be dealt with after the war... he only killed 1 million of them in concentration camps, that has nothing to do with how he would have behaved if we continued to appease him.

Which Britain should have done, until the 1960's Hitler should have been appeased and allowed to take over Spain, France and most of Asia and we should also have bowed to Hitler because we too wanted to oust the jewish banking cartel.

And Davey Jones is also right - we should never have attacked Germany and Japan because we would have saved far more lives by letting them have their way, that's the way ALL dictatorships should be treated for fear of civilian casualties, heck - if Sadam Hussein wants to gas Kurds and overthrow the entire middle east - who are we to stop him? We should let him carry on because we dont want to risk civilian casualties.

[UK_]

Highlander playing video games with kids:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcAbijcd23M

[neversaynever]

Hitlers ultimate goal was to cure baldness.

[neversaynever]

Originally Posted by UK_

Highlander was right - Hitler was leading his people out of the grips of the Jewish global banking cartel - who cares about his comments regarding how jews will be dealt with after the war... he only killed 1 million of them in concentration camps, that has nothing to do with how he would have behaved if we continued to appease him.

Which Britain should have done, until the 1960's Hitler should have been appeased and allowed to take over Spain, France and most of Asia and we should also have bowed to Hitler because we too wanted to oust the jewish banking cartel.

And Davey Jones is also right - we should never have attacked Germany and Japan because we would have saved far more lives by letting them have their way, that's the way ALL dictatorships should be treated for fear of civilian casualties, heck - if Sadam Hussein wants to gas Kurds and overthrow the entire middle east - who are we to stop him? We should let him carry on because we dont want to risk civilian casualties.

You think Britain and America went to Iraq to save the Kurds?

[UK_]

Originally Posted by neversaynever

You think Britain and America went to Iraq to save the Kurds?

Well given that the time period that separates the two events spans a period of nearly 20 years, not entirely.

However I think the Arab Spring showed the world that it wasnt just American and British politicians that wanted an end to the crazed dictatorships brutally controlling those regions. Like the internet put a rest to the Soviet Union, similar forces created the Arab Spring.

Lets be honest, a political unity between Iraq, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan etc guided by the kind of loons in those regions isnt a pretty sight, you're talking about a force greater than several Nazi Germany states spread across a geographical location larger than Russia.

[neversaynever]

Originally Posted by UK_

Well given that the time period that separates the two events spans a period of nearly 20 years, not entirely.

However I think the Arab Spring showed the world that it wasnt just American and British politicians that wanted an end to the crazed dictatorships brutally controlling those regions. Like the internet put a rest to the Soviet Union, similar forces created the Arab Spring.

Lets be honest, a political unity between Iraq, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan etc guided by the kind of loons in those regions isnt a pretty sight, you're talking about a force greater than several Nazi Germany states spread across a geographical location larger than Russia.

Your dream of westernizing the entire world will fail. In the last 100 years, 3 superpowers have actively sought that power. Soviets, Nazi's, and the Allies. The only difference is, we go in making everyone think we're saving the world. Its a madness executed in 2 different ways. Looking your enemy in the eyes and savagely attacking, or ensuring he remains your enemy, and then sneaking in through the back door and stabbing him while he's asleep (armed with the letter of the law of course).

We gasp in shock and horror at the thought of Iran obtaining a nuke, yet America and Russia have 2000 nuclear warheads EACH, and the US of course remain the ONLY country to have used nukes in warfare. Who is the threat?

Sure there are loons in power in these 'rogue' states that do horrible things. One of those loons was invited to the royal wedding, another was helped into power by the states, another loons family have huge business interests with the Bush family.

This mess is a result of conflicts with the soviet union, the constant struggle in israel (thousands of years old) and the division of arab nations by the French and British. They divided the nations according to where Brit and French interests lay. Quite similar to the conflict between Pakistan and India. We divided India, and now there is a dangerous hatred between them. In your eyes, it was a division that was needed. But in the worlds eyes...."what the hell were you thinking!".

This is nothing to do with saving the world and stamping out evil. Its everything to do with power and control. It requires us to step out of our royal box to understand this, but people can not...because in their hearts, they need to see west dominate. That need is an ancient one, and it doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that we don't have the guts to admit it.

A lot of people need an enemy in their lives. I call it "Fight Club syndrome".

[UK_]

Yeah I do agree that a lot of the 'power puppets' are in bed with each other, the Arab Spring might have even been an orchestrated grass-roots movement - because the MoD had reports on flash riots and uprisings back in their 2007 report.

They even outlined the occurrences of flash-mob riots in London (remember this time last year?). You should check out the following book, you might like it:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Grand-Chessb.../dp/0465027261

As the twentieth century draws to a close, the United States has emerged as the worlds only superpower: no other nation possesses comparable military and economic power or has interests that bestride the globe. Yet the critical question facing America remains unanswered: What should be the nations global strategy for maintaining its exceptional position in the world? Zbigniew Brzezinski tackles this question head-on in this incisive and pathbreaking book. The Grand Chessboard presents Brzezinskis bold and provocative geostrategic vision for American preeminence in the twenty-first century. Central to his analysis is the exercise of power on the Eurasian landmass, which is home to the greatest part of the globes population, natural resources, and economic activity. Stretching from Portugal to the Bering Strait, from Lapland to Malaysia, Eurasia is the grand chessboard on which Americas supremacy will be ratified and challenged in the years to come. The task facing the United States, he argues, is to manage the conflicts and relationships in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East so that no rival superpower arises to threaten our interests or our well-being. The heart of The Grand Chessboard is Brzezinskis analysis of the four critical regions of Eurasia and of the stakes for America in each arenaEurope, Russia, Central Asia, and East Asia.

lol.

[UK_]

Originally Posted by neversaynever

Hitlers ultimate goal was to cure baldness.

Do you think the fact that he was NW2/3 and progressing had part to play in his actions?