Hair loss Is preventable and reversible. A must Read!

[2020]

Originally Posted by beatinghairloss

Because castration removes the testicles being the primary site of testosterone when your prostrate adds seaman it is converting t to dht, dht is the main cause of hair loss and when removing the testicles you remove the t do it can't be converted to dht the main coss of mpb. Women's testosterone goes up as they get older and in their brains and muscles they convert dht they in rare cases produce enough dht cause hair loss. Women also lose hair primarily after birthing a boy because during male genitalia formation there is a large amount of dht production. Any one arguing these facts knows nothing on the topic

what's your point? How does that relate to your crazy theory where "circulation" causes hair loss? Obviously it's not a problem, so why don't you just move on... unless you're making money off of this

[beatinghairloss]

Originally Posted by 2020

what's your point? How does that relate to your crazy theory where "circulation" causes hair loss? Obviously it's not a problem, so why don't you just move on... unless you're making money off of this

I was just answering the persons question. Some day there will be an actual full comprehensive research done on blood flow and hair loss and mark my words I will come one here and say "I told you so"

[2020]

Originally Posted by beatinghairloss

I was just answering the persons question. Some day there will be an actual full comprehensive research done on blood flow and hair loss and mark my words I will come one here and say "I told you so"

even though I already proved your theory wrong, WHAT WOULD IT TAKE to convince you that bloodflow is not a problem?

[beatinghairloss]

Originally Posted by 2020

even though I already proved your theory wrong, WHAT WOULD IT TAKE to convince you that bloodflow is not a problem?

Any scientifically significant study would do.

[2020]

Originally Posted by beatinghairloss

Any scientifically significant study would do.

I already gave you one:

two follicles were taken out of a subject - one from donor area, and one from MPB area.

Both of those follicles were implanted on subjects arm.
Follicle from MPB area shrunk, while follicle from donor area grew just fine.

^ doesn't that prove that LOCATION doesn't matter and the problem is actually inside individual follicles that tells them to shrink???

[greatjob!]

so beatinghairloss you said you have cured your hairloss, correct? So lets see some pics. You can prove to everyone here that your crackpot theory works by posting before and after photos proving you have cured baldness. So lets see it

[gutted]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0617120716.htm

[2020]

Originally Posted by gutted

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0617120716.htm

what is this?

[Davey Jones]

Originally Posted by gutted

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0617120716.htm

I'm gonna assume the bacteria they're talking about is candida. The autoimmune response is associated with (or more accurately, it is) chronic, systemic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is bad, and I go pretty far out of my way to counter that, including measures to restrict the overdevelopment of candida.

I'm pretty unconvinced that inflammation has much to do with balding. Or, even if it is, that we can restrict it enough to have an effect on balding. I'd like to think that if we could, I would have noticed something by now. Buuuuut, maybe not.

[beatinghairloss]

Originally Posted by 2020

I already gave you one:

two follicles were taken out of a subject - one from donor area, and one from MPB area.

Both of those follicles were implanted on subjects arm.
Follicle from MPB area shrunk, while follicle from donor area grew just fine.

^ doesn't that prove that LOCATION doesn't matter and the problem is actually inside individual follicles that tells them to shrink???

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance