+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 63
  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    283

    Default

    You’re so right. A great example of this point is the way these poisonous people are destroying Dr. Gho’s credibility. It’s really too bad because I personally think that Dr. Gho’s work has a lot of merit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    You'd be surprised what negative input is capable of.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    ludicrous comparison
    You can not be serious. Do you actually expect me to believe that you are so stupid that you cannot see the relevance? It is obvious that you are not very bright – but come on... You can’t be that dumb.

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    Here is exactly what he said:

    "If we achieve 20% percent growth that would be a home run in terms of the comparative technologies out there.”

    That ain't the same thing as saying "We expect 20% growth" or "If we don't achieve 20% growth, it'll be an abysmal failure."



    That statement is itself an example of your making stuff up.
    I like how you cut and paste. Here, see i can do it too...

    "If this trial proves successful, and RepliCel can prove systemic efficacy and safety by as early as March 2012"

    "Hall says that if RepliCel can show safety and an efficacy rate of 20 percent for humans, it would become the new standard."

    “So the Phase I milestone in March is critical and we’re confident that we’re going to have hair growth. We’re not going to go forward unless we have growth. "


    Anyone who can read that news release and come away thinking that efficacy was a minor issue in this trial, either needs glasses or some reading comprehension courses.

  4. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    [...]you are so stupid [...]It is obvious that you are not very bright [...]You can’t be that dumb.
    Tracy C; try not to use insults such as these when discussing things; it typically only serves to make your argument look weaker.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    It is well past time to stop this negative BS concerning Replicel.
    I agree. The results are what they are. Let's all try to take what Replicel has accomplished at face value and move from there.

    The results aren't terrific, admittedly, but that just means there's room for improvement, no doubt.

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Alchemist View Post
    "Hall says that if RepliCel can show safety and an efficacy rate of 20 percent for humans, it would become the new standard."
    Study that sentence very carefully.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    Study that sentence very carefully.
    Study my post very carefully.


    "Anyone who can read that news release and come away thinking that efficacy was a minor issue in this trial, either needs glasses or some reading comprehension courses. "

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tracy C View Post
    Study that sentence very carefully.
    study this sentence very carefully

    "If this trial proves successful, and RepliCel can prove systemic efficacy and safety by as early as March 2012"

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quoting David Hall from the Tobin Smith interview:


    "clearly, if we demonstrate hairgrowth in excess of 20%, you're gonna attract alot of attention from biotech and big pharma"


    3.2% is where they are at.

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Alchemist View Post
    Study my post very carefully.


    "Anyone who can read that news release and come away thinking that efficacy was a minor issue in this trial, either needs glasses or some reading comprehension courses. "
    my guess is reading comprehension courses


    subject.... predicate......





    nobody is saying there isn't room for improvement... were just saying currently you're better off on rogaine... and probably will be for some time..... long enough a time that you probably shouldn't hope for much from replicel unless there is some DRASTIC, and i mean DRASTIC, changes over the next months/trial








    and lastly, I'd like to pose what is probably the most important question for Replicel:



    WHAT WENT WRONG? or, DO YOU HAVE A STRATEGY (and the data) TO DETERMINE WHAT WENT WRONG?






    I mean to me, it sounds like they're just rolling dice. 1000x typical dosage? now they're going to do less? I mean what is going on? also, people keep saying maybe these hairs will eventually grow.... has replicel stated anywhere that they think this is a possibility? or is that forum speculation?-- it's bad news if the PR or the interview didn't mention this




    also, has tracy answered any question yet posed? All i see is her replying with more questions-- all revolving around being "so dumb" "that dumb" "real dumb" etc.... at least follow it up with an explanation.

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    Tracy C is a troll. Do not feed the trolls.

    Whilst I don't always agree with Tracey, she ain't no troll. I give her credit for ringing in during the live broadcast and at least she is trying to perform some sort of service to others in terms of advice.

    Nothing wrong with cautious optimism either guys. Too many people were expecting the April results to realise their dreams. It's a small step in the right direction. - let's wait and see!

Similar Threads

  1. Negative Results - VA Surgical Center
    By jowie2 in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2011, 02:12 PM
  2. New Treatment Used in Malaysia for past 5 years..
    By d0072 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-27-2011, 10:21 PM
  3. Is it possible for propecia to have a negative result?
    By Big D in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 01:08 AM
  4. Does Propecia stop working over time?
    By g k in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-16-2010, 07:50 AM
  5. head shaved for past 10+ yrs.
    By seatown in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 04:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Dr Lauster's Team (Berlin University of Technology)
06-28-2014 12:15 AM
Last Post By sdsurfin
Today 01:01 AM
Versapro: How can we all get it?
10-18-2014 03:44 PM
Last Post By sdsurfin
Today 12:48 AM
Dr. Bhatti- 3000 FUE grafts in a single session
Yesterday 08:44 PM
Last Post By HARIRI
Yesterday 10:08 PM
Have teens always suffered with MPB?
Yesterday 09:29 PM
Last Post By ThisSucksDude
Yesterday 09:29 PM
adipose-derived stem cell protein extract
05-13-2014 02:42 PM
by hgs1989
Last Post By nameless
Yesterday 08:54 PM