Bald Truth Talk - Hair Loss, Hair Transplant and Hair Restoration Community  

Go Back   Bald Truth Talk - Hair Loss, Hair Transplant and Hair Restoration Community > Men's Hair Loss > Hair Loss Treatments > Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2012, 02:31 PM   #811
cleverusername
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersixx View Post
I'm with you on this. If they had good news to share and not just another "advancement" it would of leaked by now. For god sakes it don't take a year to actually figure if it works. When they accidentally made mice grow hair in a couple of weeks , it was all over the news , probably before the mice knew it had hair. (PGD2 discovery? )Lol....solving MPB and reversing hair loss is the biggest riddle right up there w Alzheimers and aids. People will literally sell they belongings to look and be "'normal". And any significant chatter will like cause others like aderans, histogen, etc. to put out there PR team as well.... It's a race . First one cures it ,is the first to control the market. These clinical trial updates is just that........you'll like find out they found a cure on the bottom of your screen or interrupted breaking news.........trust me......putting a full head of hair on a NW6 is like Bigfoot getting outta cab in NYC.....lol....#majornewz....so I'm skeptic .
Why would they leak information that has an effect on their shares?? That would be stupid.. not to mention the people who are in the trials probably had to sign legal disclosures and a bunch of other shit saying they won't say anything regarding the trial... pretty sure that would be a breach of confidentiality. And the trials take time because they need to determine whether or not there are sides. They aren't just going to offer a treatment and cross their fingers we don't get cancer...
cleverusername is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 10:57 PM   #812
lpenergy
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 60
Default Upcoming interviews / NBT Equities

I don't know if anyone has come across this, but the investment group that created the research report for Replicel has just provided an update saying that they have dozens of post-interviews scheduled with Replicel following the trial results.

So, besides the Bald Truth interview, it looks like there will be a fair bit of discussion with all these interviews.

As stated on the link below: "Our NBT Media Relations team is ALL over the announcement with dozens of interviews lined up post-announcementůstay tuned!"

http://www.nbtequitiesresearch.com/r...s-of-hair-loss

So, maybe that means an interview with David Hall, some of their top scientists, independent hair research scientists, and possibly biotech experts.
lpenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 11:33 PM   #813
ccmethinning
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpenergy View Post
I don't know if anyone has come across this, but the investment group that created the research report for Replicel has just provided an update saying that they have dozens of post-interviews scheduled with Replicel following the trial results.

So, besides the Bald Truth interview, it looks like there will be a fair bit of discussion with all these interviews.

As stated on the link below: "Our NBT Media Relations team is ALL over the announcement with dozens of interviews lined up post-announcementůstay tuned!"

http://www.nbtequitiesresearch.com/r...s-of-hair-loss

So, maybe that means an interview with David Hall, some of their top scientists, independent hair research scientists, and possibly biotech experts.
The disclaimer is pretty telling. Replicel is paying NBT for their coverage.
ccmethinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:48 AM   #814
Pate
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
The disclaimer is pretty telling. Replicel is paying NBT for their coverage.
Nothing unusual there. It's standard practice for smaller companies to pay for broker coverage. It's one of the reasons you have to be so very careful when a broker report is published waxing lyrical about some random company.
Pate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 12:25 PM   #815
lpenergy
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pate View Post
Nothing unusual there. It's standard practice for smaller companies to pay for broker coverage. It's one of the reasons you have to be so very careful when a broker report is published waxing lyrical about some random company.
Understood. I am just glad that there will be some good post result analysis and discussion of why the trial either succeeded or failed. I suppose if the results were not they were hoping for, they could cancel. More discussion is better, imho.
lpenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 01:54 PM   #816
Sogeking
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 280
Default

We're going to discuss the hell out of those results on the forum. I'm sure of that.

What interests me is the exact date for the results, but somehow I don't think we'll get that.
I mean late April is vague. it could be the 20th of April and it could be the last day in April.
Sogeking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 04:18 PM   #817
gmonasco
Senior Member
 
gmonasco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 872
Lightbulb

Realistically, though, what will a "successful" trial of Replicel mean to people here? Given the limited nature of the current clinical trial, will Replicel be able to say much of anything beyond "There might be potential here; we won't know for sure until we've run more trials"?
gmonasco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 04:28 PM   #818
NotBelievingIt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
Realistically, though, what will a "successful" trial of Replicel mean to people here? Given the limited nature of the current clinical trial, will Replicel be able to say much of anything beyond "There might be potential here; we won't know for sure until we've run more trials"?
You're right on the money.

Unless the growth of the non-placebo is phenomenol and doesn't take some closeup photograph to see...it will likely just be a 'we have enough evidence to warrant further more specific "higher dosage" trials due to the success on the limited basis we have seen'
NotBelievingIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 04:50 PM   #819
The Alchemist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt View Post
You're right on the money.

Unless the growth of the non-placebo is phenomenol and doesn't take some closeup photograph to see...it will likely just be a 'we have enough evidence to warrant further more specific "higher dosage" trials due to the success on the limited basis we have seen'

I agree. I'm not expecting to see anything that's going to blow my mind. I'm guessing it will be similar to the photos that aderans showed, if it works. They'll compare whatever they have to minox/fin and if it beats it, they'll take that protocol forward. If not, it's back to the drawing board and having to work out the kinks in the method... if that happens we can put them on the back burner for another 5-8yrs, such as was/is the case with Aderans. I really hope they get some whopping amounts of growth and we can start partying. It's been a long, difficult wait for anything to happen this field....I think everyone deserves some good news.
The Alchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 05:23 PM   #820
lpenergy
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt View Post
You're right on the money.

Unless the growth of the non-placebo is phenomenol and doesn't take some closeup photograph to see...it will likely just be a 'we have enough evidence to warrant further more specific "higher dosage" trials due to the success on the limited basis we have seen'
The intial trial was an "overdosing" trial. David Hall said that they injected millions of cells into the testing location on the temples to prove whether the treatment worked at all and if it was safe. If it doesn't work, it won't be because they did not inject a high enough number of cells!

I went back and re-listened to the first interview done by Spencer and I picked up something I missed the first time around. Back in September 2011, it was anticipated that during phase II, they would be dosing down in 3 increment levels down, to determine the number of cells that would need to be injected to provide an effective treatement, and possibly provide a range of hair regrowth dependent upon the number of cells injected.
lpenergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
replicel, replicel: last hope, replifail, treatment

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» The Bald Truth
» Recent Threads
UK FUT with D Krishnan Ziering
01-05-2014 09:14 AM
Last post by Scraff
Today 02:29 AM
Dutasteride in UK
Today 02:14 AM
by alex82
Last post by alex82
Today 02:14 AM
» Newest Videos

Update On Hairloss 8/10/09...
My hair loss was getting worse, so I just got it cut really short now. I don't think it looks that b...


Hair Loss Remedy Myths Perpetuated Onlin...
We are sure these people mean well, but this is a prime example of why the snake oil industry thrive...


Hair Transplant | "SurgeonofNalts&q...
http://www.baldtruthtalk.comFounder of The American Hair Loss Association Spencer Kobren speaks with...


How Hair Loss Colors Our Lives | Spencer...
...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:34 AM.