Hair Talk, we will try to do a better job in the future to satisfy your photographic needs. In the meantime, we are promoting hair transplant surgery, a proven entity. We are not trying to raise speculative dollars selling a technology like Histogen. Histogen is held to a higher standard because their technology is not proven. They need perceived results to fund a round of speculation from their investors. Most of their investors do not have the experience that someone like myself has to analyze their photographs and recognize that the photos are inconsistent with the pre-operateive photos. Maybe you would give them a million dollars to further investigate these unimpressive photos, but I would not and i would not encourage any of my friends to invest in a unproven technology.
In general, we have far more results than we post. We don't post as many as we have simply because we have always felt that patients hold us to a higher standard. If it looks good, but does not meet our standard, we will not post it. If there are obstructing things like hair clips hiding the results, we will not post them. With over 10,000 hair transplant procedures, I can assure you that I have many more results than i post. Of course only a limited number of patients allow their photographs to be posted, but even then we allow only those patient results that are fair and balanced to be depicted on our website over the course of time. Anyone can change the lighting to make a result look better. That's not our modus operandi.
Having said all this, i would put our results up against what I've seen from Histogen 7 days a week.
Regarding blurry, i don't like that. i like clean and crisp. I think you need to be able to focus on a result. i've seen far to many results that were not clean and crisp to the point that you cannot magnify them. I've always felt this was important and i will speak with my webmaster to insure that we do not deviate from my personal standards. Of course you can't always insure that patients send you the highest quality pre-op or post-op photos, but you can ensure that you post the highest quality images to your webslte. We've done this in the past. i don't micromanage my non-surgical staff, but I also don't allow anything other than perfection. In my surgery room I have my eye on everything Outside it, I can only evaluate what was done such as photographs. Sill given that our only photographs are of the highest standards and we cannot control photographs that patients send us, I honestly feel that you are maliciously over reaching in your comments, Hair Talk. There are far more clinics with obvious suboptimal photographs, but you have singled mine out. What is your objective? How could you compare my results to those of Histogen, when those of Histogen are nothing short of misleading?
In general, we have far more results than we post. We don't post as many as we have simply because we have always felt that patients hold us to a higher standard. If it looks good, but does not meet our standard, we will not post it. If there are obstructing things like hair clips hiding the results, we will not post them. With over 10,000 hair transplant procedures, I can assure you that I have many more results than i post. Of course only a limited number of patients allow their photographs to be posted, but even then we allow only those patient results that are fair and balanced to be depicted on our website over the course of time. Anyone can change the lighting to make a result look better. That's not our modus operandi.
Having said all this, i would put our results up against what I've seen from Histogen 7 days a week.
Regarding blurry, i don't like that. i like clean and crisp. I think you need to be able to focus on a result. i've seen far to many results that were not clean and crisp to the point that you cannot magnify them. I've always felt this was important and i will speak with my webmaster to insure that we do not deviate from my personal standards. Of course you can't always insure that patients send you the highest quality pre-op or post-op photos, but you can ensure that you post the highest quality images to your webslte. We've done this in the past. i don't micromanage my non-surgical staff, but I also don't allow anything other than perfection. In my surgery room I have my eye on everything Outside it, I can only evaluate what was done such as photographs. Sill given that our only photographs are of the highest standards and we cannot control photographs that patients send us, I honestly feel that you are maliciously over reaching in your comments, Hair Talk. There are far more clinics with obvious suboptimal photographs, but you have singled mine out. What is your objective? How could you compare my results to those of Histogen, when those of Histogen are nothing short of misleading?
Comment