+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    IAHRS Recommended Hair Transplant Surgeon Sara Wasserbauer, MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Walnut Creek, CA
    Posts
    19

    Default FUE common questions

    I just had a consult where a younger guy brought his older uncle and his Dad and ALL of them wanted to know about various aspects of FUE. It is true, FUE as a technique is evolving rapidly. Between the advent of the Robotic ARTAS system, and newer practitioners getting the hang of it, it is now more available to patients than ever. Here are a few questions from that "group consult" about the limits of this technique that I wanted to share;

    1) If I have done a previous hair transplant with the traditional "strip" technique, can I still get an FUE hair transplant?
    -Yes, you can. Just realize two things: FIRST if you want to get the highest number of grafts from the session you will need to shave your head on the back and sides and thus your old linear scar may be visible, and SECOND the area immediately surrounding the scar is not easily harvested. That is to say about 1 cm above and below an old linear scar the hair gets pulled in odd directions under the skin and transection rates become unacceptably high. In those cases it can do more harm than good to harvest close to the scar so most experienced FUE surgeons will leave a band of unharvested hair on either side.

    2) Does FUE get fewer grafts than the strip technique?
    - In general, yes. However, some heads are great for this sort of surgery and yield many more grafts than others, and some surgeons are able to get more grafts than others, too. Realize that there is a learning curve to performing an effective FUE procedure. Surgeons who do it often can get their transection rates down to percents in the single digits (1%-5% is mine) and graft counts to over 2000 (my last surgery was 2400+ grafts). This is one technique where experience definitely counts.

    3) Can you do FUE with curly or white hair?
    - Again, the answer is yes. Here are the caveats; a doctor may dye the hair temporarily if the white hairs cannot be seen easily and the robotic hair transplant is not approved for this hair type (although it may be used off-label for that with an experienced surgeon), AND curly hair can result in transection rates of 20-30%. I find those rates unacceptably high but some patients and some surgeons are willing to lose that much hair in order to achieve a less-visible level of scarring.

    Remember - FUE is NOT SCARLESS! The scarring is just less noticeable. Furthermore, FUE is just as invasive as a "strip" surgery in that the incision is the same depth in the skin, about 3-4 mm. I think some patients are swayed by the words "minimally invasive" in FUE advertisements when in fact a traditional surgery would be a better procedure to fulfill their individual needs.

    I hope that helps everyone! Good luck with your choices!
    Sara Wasserbauer, MD
    Member, International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
    View my IAHRS Profile

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,094

    Default

    Nice writeup. Interesting about the transection rates being so high with curly hair. Also I always assumed that 1 cm above the scar would be left untouched but did not know 1cm below would also be left.

    Seems that the figure of 1500-2000FUE after stripping out that I hear a lot makes sense. Thanks for the info doc.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sara Wasserbauer, MD View Post
    FUE is just as invasive as a "strip" surgery in that the incision is the same depth in the skin, about 3-4 mm. I think
    I think you should rethink this part.

  4. #4
    IAHRS Recommended Hair Transplant Surgeon Sara Wasserbauer, MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Walnut Creek, CA
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Ha! I agree that that appears funny when one reads it that way. However, if you will go back and re-read, the "I think" at the end of that sentence is actually part of the next sentence.
    Sara Wasserbauer, MD
    Member, International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
    View my IAHRS Profile

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sara Wasserbauer, MD View Post
    Ha! I agree that that appears funny when one reads it that way. However, if you will go back and re-read, the "I think" at the end of that sentence is actually part of the next sentence.
    i can read everything back and forth –that doesn’t change anything.

    could be a nice question for your next “hair’s the question” contribution: is the incision depth in fue the same as in fut?

    i think we talk here about the donor site, of course. and if so, you should rethink what you wrote.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    182

    Default

    Hi Dr. Wasserbauer,

    Thanks for the information. Very interesting and informative.

    I have a quick question in regards to FUE extraction. When the surgeon attempts to extract a follicle from the donor site, i have read that if the follicle is transected prematurely, the hair in the donor site will regrow. I'm assuming a reasonable amount of the follicle must be left over for it to regrow. What if only 5 % or 10% of the follicle is left over ? Will it still regrow in the donor ?

    I ask this because i had a 1,250 FUE session a year ago and recently another HT surgeon told me i appear to have a lot more extraction sites in my donor area than someone who has only had 1,250 grafts removed.

    Also, do the follicles that regrow, regrow from the white dots since the punch was made causing the hypopigmentation?

    Sorry for all the questions. Thanks.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,094

    Default

    I've seen Dr. Feller talk about this transection business before. With his tool he scores the scalp and makes the punch, then pulls it out if it is suitable. I think if he thinks it's transected he can kind of leave it in as the root will be ok for the most part and the hair will grow back. I might have it wrong. I'm not sure.

  8. #8
    IAHRS Recommended Hair Transplant Surgeon Sara Wasserbauer, MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Walnut Creek, CA
    Posts
    19

    Default

    The general rules regarding regrowth of a transected graft are:
    1)The lower 2/3 and 1/2 will regrow a normal caliber hair
    2) The upper 2/3 and upper 1/2 grafts will first regenerate the bottom and then regrow. The upper 1/2 hairs are finer when they grow and may take longer to grow
    3) anything less than 1/2 of the follicle will not likely regrow

    The original study which showed these results was done by Kim and Choi and is titled "Hair Survival of Partial Follicles." It is an interesting read, even if you are not a doctor, so I do suggest you take a look!

    The little white areas of hypo-pigmentation are the scars left from removing the hair so those will not be re-growing a new hair.

    It would be difficult to assess how many FUE attempts a hair surgeon made just by looking at a patient's head - even for another hair surgeon, so I would take that advice with a grain of salt and maybe give your original surgeon the benefit of the doubt. If your original surgeon is anything like me, he documented how many attempts were made versus how many grafts were obtained (i.e. what his/her YIELD was) and what the transection rate was. Give your old surgeon a call! As part of your medical record you should have access to that information (if they documented it), and the facts are always better than just wondering. Good luck!
    Sara Wasserbauer, MD
    Member, International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
    View my IAHRS Profile

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sara Wasserbauer, MD View Post
    3) anything less than 1/2 of the follicle will not likely regrow
    Thanks for the reply Dr. Wasserbauer. That makes sense, just a quick question.

    If a HT surgeon transects a graft prematurely, i'm assuming the errors are very small, say < 1mm. Would an unethical doctor still place the graft in the recipient area and 'hope' for the best ? As in, the errors might be so small that he/she may well believe the graft has a chance to grow, but they still realise it hasn't been perfectly extracted from the donor site.

    If they do this, what happens to the transplanted hair in the recipient area. Does it just stay there in a dormant state until manually removed ?

    Thanks again.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sara Wasserbauer, MD View Post
    The general rules regarding regrowth of a transected graft are:
    1)The lower 2/3 and 1/2 will regrow a normal caliber hair
    2) The upper 2/3 and upper 1/2 grafts will first regenerate the bottom and then regrow. The upper 1/2 hairs are finer when they grow and may take longer to grow
    3) anything less than 1/2 of the follicle will not likely regrow

    The original study which showed these results was done by Kim and Choi and is titled "Hair Survival of Partial Follicles." It is an interesting read, even if you are not a doctor, so I do suggest you take a look!

    The little white areas of hypo-pigmentation are the scars left from removing the hair so those will not be re-growing a new hair.

    It would be difficult to assess how many FUE attempts a hair surgeon made just by looking at a patient's head - even for another hair surgeon, so I would take that advice with a grain of salt and maybe give your original surgeon the benefit of the doubt. If your original surgeon is anything like me, he documented how many attempts were made versus how many grafts were obtained (i.e. what his/her YIELD was) and what the transection rate was. Give your old surgeon a call! As part of your medical record you should have access to that information (if they documented it), and the facts are always better than just wondering. Good luck!
    Thanks for the info doc. What do you make of Dr. Coen Gho and Dr. Martino Neumanns' paper on donor hair follicle preservation by partial follicular unit extraction? It looks like some good science to me but then I think how the hell can this work in practice consistently. It has us all wondering at the moment about this HST technique. Could it really work? I've yet to see any conclusive evidence of it working in practice though which sets alarm bells off for me.

Similar Threads

  1. Is Donor Area Shock Loss Common?
    By TheFirst17 in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-08-2012, 08:41 PM
  2. Whats more common?
    By twhacker in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-11-2011, 09:40 PM
  3. Propceia: How common are PERMENENT sexual side effects
    By Krangstein in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2010, 02:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

27 yr old. Trying to figure out my norwood. PICS
10-18-2014 08:17 PM
Last Post By peterdinklage
Today 09:12 PM
Ruxolitinib
Today 08:39 PM
Today 08:39 PM
We have a vehicle for CB-03-01: VERSAPRO
10-05-2014 06:05 AM
Last Post By pagedo
Today 08:38 PM
Rapidly Thinning Hair
Today 08:24 PM
by JS1994
Last Post By JS1994
Today 08:24 PM