+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7
Results 61 to 63 of 63
  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccmethinning View Post
    No, efficacy wasn't more important than proving safety. But efficacy was a whole lot more important than many here are making it out to be.

    This is a tiny little public company with funding problems and competition (ARI, Histogen, Follica, etc). Because of this, they had to design the trial to produce as much success as they could in a phase 1 safety trial to develop investor interest. This isn't some massive university cancer research department with government funds where they can just throw shit at the wall and hope it sticks. They needed results, and they definitely underwhelmed.

    Over the past couple months, the company completed offerings worth a couple million dollars or so at $1.50/share (which at that time was well below market value). Now market value for shares is $1.27. They are going to have to sell more of their interest for less money now. Not to mention, whoever it was that bought in at $1.50 has to be pretty pissed off to be sitting underwater now and might not throw any more money at the company.

    I think this sums up Replicel's position very well. Right now, Replicel is hoping and praying that something good happens at the injection sites over the next 6 months; as i think everyone is.

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jman91 View Post
    have they confirmed another trial yet?
    They said in the release that we will proceed to phase II. Does this mean they actually will? IDK. But I feel it is very likely that they do proceed to phase II based on the release and interviews.

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    If something did happen over the next 6 months then that means we will have to add an extra year on top of however long it takes to get a cure out before we get hair. So 3-4 years. Thats starting to sound too far away for me personally. Whatever happens a hairloss cure has come too late for me.

Similar Threads

  1. Negative Results - VA Surgical Center
    By jowie2 in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2011, 03:12 PM
  2. New Treatment Used in Malaysia for past 5 years..
    By d0072 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-27-2011, 11:21 PM
  3. Is it possible for propecia to have a negative result?
    By Big D in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 02:08 AM
  4. Does Propecia stop working over time?
    By g k in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-16-2010, 08:50 AM
  5. head shaved for past 10+ yrs.
    By seatown in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 05:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Histogen news
05-08-2014 08:00 AM
by James7
Last Post By Reign
Today 06:54 PM
Theracell, new competitor in the hair regeneration field
Today 02:45 AM
Last Post By ejj
Today 06:54 PM
Has Beard/Body hair FUE advanced enough to use on Crown?
01-25-2015 12:23 PM
Last Post By showbizdude
Today 06:38 PM
follicept - what's this?
02-24-2015 05:01 PM
by joachim
Last Post By sdsurfin
Today 06:02 PM
Trx2?
10-28-2010 02:01 AM
by BoSox
Last Post By Swooping
Today 05:27 PM
Hr23+
02-24-2015 10:52 AM
by KMoney
Last Post By KMoney
Today 05:07 PM