05-03-2012 02:56 AM
Does anyone know when the new Replicel interview is going to be released?
05-03-2012 03:19 AM
There are some seriously fickle people on this thread. They make me think of people running from one side of a ship to the other, one minute expecting miracles the next blowing any sort of advance out the water.
These were safety tests. They seem to have passed. If they choose to advance to the next level then good, it's no skin off your nose if you arnt financing it.
I understand there are some desperate souls here, but get some stability in your lives. I don't see as replicel owe you anything, let them get on with their work, all you guys do is guess continually anyway.
05-03-2012 08:47 AM
Originally Posted by re22
probably "sometime in may" lol... similar to their result release
05-03-2012 12:26 PM
It's kind of amusing (if not sad) to see people in these forums whine about how so many supposedly promising treatments aren't being followed up on, then whine again when somebody actually does follow up on them.
Originally Posted by Papillion
Although it's of little comfort to people who insist on treatments promising more hair RIGHT NOW, even failed research efforts are an important part of the overall process.
05-03-2012 12:54 PM
05-03-2012 01:09 PM
05-04-2012 12:59 AM
Interview's been done already, got its own thread, like here there's good and bad posts but of course what you do is listen to the interview yourself and disect the info how you see fit, just beware (unlike some) it's best to keep the innervoice to yourself, share but don't scare!
C'mon Replicel, we've a Big3 (and then some, some guys don't realise) fighting to make this happen!
05-05-2012 01:56 AM
Actually if anything, I think it would work better in women, just as Rogaine has been shown to - the reason for this being that women's hair follicles aren't as "far gone" as men's. As for unstable donor cells, even if that were an issue, it doesn't seem like that would have an effect on these initial results (though possibly those hairs might fall out faster in the long run).
Originally Posted by oracle
I think the negativity is ridiculous. They've produced results (though fairly small), they proved safety - and people are blasting them because they haven't cured baldness in their PHASE I trial. We all want a cure, so the negative comments aren't helping anyone, especially when they're not based on anything. Let the scientists do their jobs, live your lives, and understand that it's more about the big picture than every little set of seemingly disappointing results. Remember Histogen produced impressive results as well - there's more than one company working on this, and we really only need one of them to get it right.
05-05-2012 02:23 AM
I have a objection to your post though
Naturally if your hair cells are weak enough to produce hair, then they produce hair at the microscopic level under your skin so I don't know why Repicell calls it's results a positive and optimistic results. by seen 12 microscopic hairs grown.
05-13-2012 06:49 PM
hey guys, i was trying to make a thread but i cant for some reason it wont let me. I was gonna ask:
1. Will replicel release photos from their most recent results?
2. Will they give us another update 6 months from their most recent results to see how their patients are doing after a year?
Tags for this Thread
» The Bald Truth