-
09-19-2011 07:37 AM
#1171
Originally Posted by CVAZBAR
I sent an email to Dr. Gail Naughton around 3 weeks ago, asking if the trials were in progress and up to date. I made it clear that I was not expecting any results at this point and just wanted to know if they started trials. I'm not sure what to make of her reply but at least it seems Histogen is still alive ha.
Hi, CVAZBAR
Good to hear from you.
As I write this my clinical director and I are on our way to Alaska for the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery annual meeting where our two year follow up hair study and some new applications of our product will be presented by both Dr. Craig Ziering and Dr. Neil Sadick. Our IND is under review in Asia and we are finalizing our regulatory strategy for North America. We will send out a formal statement shortly and remain excited by the level of interest in HSC from both clinicians and patients.
Please stay in touch.
Take care,
Gail
Shall we really believe you that she replied to you? the presidents of the company? she's not busy at all? she would say hi CVAZBAR, instead of your name as in Hi Joel... or if thats your name you think she would say it all in caps?
-
09-19-2011 08:14 AM
#1172
Originally Posted by abb83
Shall we really believe you that she replied to you? the presidents of the company? she's not busy at all? she would say hi CVAZBAR, instead of your name as in Hi Joel... or if thats your name you think she would say it all in caps?
You are reaching.
CVAZBAR just put his nickname instead of his real name. When you send an email from an email adress that goes like this: name.surname@yahoo.com. Then I think you can see how she knows his name. Now it is possible that this mail was written by her secretary or someone else and made to look like its from her. We can't tell.
But I really don't think that CVAZBAR or anyone for that matter would make up an email that doesn't divulge anything impotant. What possible gain does he have from this?
-
09-19-2011 08:17 AM
#1173
Originally Posted by Sogeking
You are reaching.
CVAZBAR just put his nickname instead of his real name. When you send an email from an email adress that goes like this: name.surname@yahoo.com. Then I think you can see how she knows his name. Now it is possible that this mail was written by her secretary or someone else and made to look like its from her. We can't tell.
But I really don't think that CVAZBAR or anyone for that matter would make up an email that doesn't divulge anything impotant. What possible gain does he have from this?
then i am sorry :s there's a lot of people full of bs. i regret my previous post if thats the case. i actually emailed her a long time ago and never got back.
-
09-19-2011 12:11 PM
#1174
Sogeking is 100% right. I used my nickname posting it here but she replied to me by my name. Yes, maybe it was her secretary as I cannot prove otherwise. I also understand if nobody wants to believe it. All I can say is that I don't bullshit and have no reason to do it. It's up to you guys whether you want to believe or not.
-
09-20-2011 07:39 AM
#1175
Originally Posted by CVAZBAR
Sogeking is 100% right. I used my nickname posting it here but she replied to me by my name. Yes, maybe it was her secretary as I cannot prove otherwise. I also understand if nobody wants to believe it. All I can say is that I don't bullshit and have no reason to do it. It's up to you guys whether you want to believe or not.
nah thx for sharing mate
-
09-25-2011 07:25 AM
#1176
So I'm guessing everyone is just tired of posting speculation and we're all just waiting for data from all the different clinical trials to come in Q1 2012?? haha
-
09-25-2011 12:52 PM
#1177
Pretty well, yes, After 122 pages there is only so much you can speculate before some real trial data comes in.
-
09-25-2011 09:36 PM
#1178
Spencer said he will post info soon on Histogen, Acell etc from the meetings in Alaska.
-
09-25-2011 11:16 PM
#1179
Originally Posted by CVAZBAR
Spencer said he will post info soon on Histogen, Acell etc from the meetings in Alaska.
I'm going to assume that Histogen's results were good. otherwise rassman would have already blogged about it being a failure... him omitting any mention of it is, sadly, a sign that it went well.
-
09-26-2011 12:26 AM
#1180
Originally Posted by NeedHairASAP
I'm going to assume that Histogen's results were good. otherwise rassman would have already blogged about it being a failure... him omitting any mention of it is, sadly, a sign that it went well.
Let's hope it is. I'm guessing it won't be anything special, maybe just an update from the pre-trials.
Similar Threads
-
By tbtadmin in forum Histogen's Hair Stimulating Complex (HSC)
Replies: 5
Last Post: 07-21-2016, 01:34 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 14
Last Post: 05-09-2011, 03:06 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-04-2010, 09:10 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-17-2010, 01:01 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks