• 11-23-2012 01:25 PM
    youngsufferer
    Reminds me of christians.

    If you're sure you're correct in your thinking, why does me questioning it bother you in the slightest?

    Sounds like Histogen is having a lot of trouble.
  • 11-23-2012 01:28 PM
    rdawg
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    I've just finished listened to the interview...

    Apparently ziering himself injected HSC and according to him he is still slowly losing hair after dropping finasteride... Reflex hyperandrogenicity or HSC fail?

    he spent most of his interview time calling out "haters". "who are you telling us it doesn't work", "if you're so smart why don't you try solving this"... etc.
    Your pictures suck and you're all vague as ****. Get over it...

    I almost went apeshit as he was mentioning significant that, significant that... say significant again I dare you mother****er

    way to take it out of context.

    For the most part he said every single patient had positive results of varying degrees.
    He has for the most part a full head of hair so he said he'd be shedding alot more had he not taing HSC and has largely maintained.

    the one negative comment and you focus on it.

    Alot of positive to take from this, they're in the early stages and still trying to work out the kinks, but at no point did he say there were any negative effects after 1-2 years.
  • 11-23-2012 01:39 PM
    2020
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rdawg View Post
    For the most part he said every single patient had positive results of varying degrees.

    "varying degrees". He would have described that as significant results which means jack in the context of medicine. 56 is significant improvement from 53. 5000 is also significantly greater than 53. You see my point?

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rdawg View Post
    He has for the most part a full head of hair so he said he'd be shedding alot more had he not taing HSC and has largely maintained.

    best I could buy is: reflex hyperandrogenicity which means you're now significantly(hahaha :D) more responsive to DHT's effects.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rdawg View Post
    the one negative comment and you focus on it.

    Alot of positive to take from this, they're in the early stages and still trying to work out the kinks, but at no point did he say there were any negative effects after 1-2 years.

    it has been almost 5 years. That's a significant portion of one's life :p
  • 11-23-2012 01:57 PM
    hellouser
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    "varying degrees". He would have described that as significant results which means jack in the context of medicine. 56 is significant improvement from 53. 5000 is also significantly greater than 53. You see my point?

    LOL! No, I don't see your point. You make is sound as if 6% is significant relative to hair count and density.

    I think you need to go back to elementary and pass your basic math courses.
  • 11-23-2012 02:19 PM
    bananana
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    . . . . . . .

    nothing is good enough for you. you act sometimes as a spoiled brat. you want it now, you want it all.

    i agree ziering is avoiding all "concrete" numbers, but that is the way startups function. what do you want to hear? "50 000 new grafts thick as a god damn elephant leg sprouting all over within 21.5 minutes of application? hair keeps growing after you die? it's transferable to your entire family? it costs $0.99 and is available in every tesco/walmart/kaufland?!"

    We've been over this xxxxxx times on this forum. You guys will have to agree we're the luckiest humans in the 30000 year history regarding hairloss. Period.

    Show some gratitude.
    Sorry for my tone.
  • 11-23-2012 04:11 PM
    Dan26
    I don't know who this Dr.Zeriing is but I don't need him to tell me if it works or not! It is a HUGE step in fighting hairloss! My only concern is cost and exclusivity.
  • 11-23-2012 04:26 PM
    2020
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bananana View Post
    nothing is good enough for you. you act sometimes as a spoiled brat. you want it now, you want it all.

    Is it wrong of me to be skeptical about the results due to their extremely poor pictures and vague information? Dr. Ziering mentioned that he will be posting pictures to this forum soon so we have that to look forward to...

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bananana View Post
    "50 000 new grafts thick as a god damn elephant leg sprouting all over within 21.5 minutes of application? hair keeps growing after you die? it's transferable to your entire family? it costs $0.99 and is available in every tesco/walmart/kaufland?!"

    as long as hair growth is significant that's all that matters...

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bananana View Post
    We've been over this xxxxxx times on this forum. You guys will have to agree we're the luckiest humans in the 30000 year history regarding hairloss. Period.

    we were also the luckiest in 2000, 1990, 1980... I don't see your point. Years will progress no matter what.
  • 11-23-2012 04:31 PM
    Dan26
    And 2020 I really don't blame your skeptism based on what we have actually SEEN.

    BUT, you will soon realize Histogen is big for us.
  • 11-24-2012 10:17 AM
    HairTalk
    I think the point is, people want their hair back. No one gives a damn about vellus growth — let's stop talk about it, as if they did.
  • 11-24-2012 10:18 AM
    HairTalk
    [Double-post: please delete.]

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth