KeepHoping

The ability to achieve an aesthetic donor incision closure is, in all the research I have done using ACell, not improved at all with the use of that product. Nothing seems to take the place of good surgical technique and the patient's characteristics, despite all the hype of
certain products.

Hi KeepHoping,

I’m sorry, but I simply do not believe in ACell as it has been promoted as a way to get perfect donor site closures.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey S. Epstein, MD, FACS

Did you get a response from Dr Cole so far? Btw i swear there is a Zig Zag pattern on the left side. I even hide the right side and looked again at the left and its still there. And you are right, thats exactly what acell does. Or am i wrong here?

You could also test it on a small scale. I really think this time where sufferer are talking with surgeons here we can get something to work

This is actually a good idea, because it is also in an experimental stage right now. But you know what i think? I think both Cole and Hitzig and Cooley redefined the plucking technique for the mass market and in 6 month the will offer it as additionally technique.

I hope he will cut the deal with you because right now you are the best evidence the whole balding community worldwide has PERIOD.

Thats ok so far. But i am not a fan of the argument "FUT has better yield" i dont believe that, most Surgeons use it because it doesnt take a lot of time to do FUT. I really hope that Dr Cole is getting back to you, cause this would be groundbreaking. also i personally belief that with CIT (is not so deep transecting the follicle) that permanent regrow in the Donor area can be guaranteed.iam very thankful that you would take one for the team (but between us, you and me we both now that with acell and plucking there is NO scar tissue or anything else) and also we have someone who can easily proof everything. But unfortunately after some time you have to plug the hair from the recipient area, Cause we have to see if it cycles (it will cycle but only for the naysayers) From what i can say, Acell/Prp will stop hairloss completely from progressing BUT the rate of hair regrow is not that amazing, but hey i think its way better to know "i wont be a blank NW5 or higher in this life".

u should nail Dr Hitzig with plucking and Acell, you should really do it. Positive effect for you (you got yourself some coverage for almost no money with no donor depleating) and on the other hand those fruitless naysayers will finally stop talking all the time about "Its impossible"

To me it seems like, that hairloss sufferers are finally rethink the whole idea about hair transplants. Cause lets be honest, do you wanna pay a huge amount of money only to get an "illusion" or do you wanna pay money and get in fact more hair and a guarantee to never do fin and minox again.

i tend to the second option. Also with years passing by, there are more and more and more repair cases coming up at an alarming rate :-/ (all due to flaps and FUT)

So the best bet today, even if you are young and suffer hairloss, is going for someting non to less invasive like plucking and FUE with Acell but not FUT or FUE without Acell.

You should really nail Dr Hitzig with performing Acell/Plucking and Acell/PRP

Hey KH

thanks for your participation. I hope you get in touch with Dr Cole as soon as possible. For our all benefit :-)

Thanks again Bro